Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
<< <i>one thing i like about their book is that the authors explain the criteria for inclusion in the reference which limits size and theme. >>
My understanding is that the limits placed on SCDs included in the original HK was not meant to limit was was considered a SCD but used to make the book manageable. When I read the intro, my feeling was that they considered many other medals and tokens to be SCDs outside of what they chose to include in their book due to size constraints.
For me, there's really nothing magical about having or not having a HK number. SCDs aren't limited to what has an HK number for me.
Comments
<< <i>Ahhh. Bach. >>
Bach at one.
Offenbach at one thirty.
<< <i>one thing i like about their book is that the authors explain the criteria for inclusion in the reference which limits size and theme. >>
My understanding is that the limits placed on SCDs included in the original HK was not meant to limit was was considered a SCD but used to make the book manageable. When I read the intro, my feeling was that they considered many other medals and tokens to be SCDs outside of what they chose to include in their book due to size constraints.
For me, there's really nothing magical about having or not having a HK number. SCDs aren't limited to what has an HK number for me.
I was just getting ready to
trade my SCDs in for jelly donuts.
Camelot