Options
How do NGC and PCGS Compare on Grading Kennedy Halves?
The PCGS coins seem to bring more money than NGC coins on the auctions I have checked, but does anyone have an opinion on how the grading differs between the two services?
Charlie
Charlie
0
Comments
Joe
The two companies have a different approach to the cameo and deep cameo designations. NGC's focus leans more toward the frostiness of the devices. PCGS leans more toward the depth of the mirrors. So, crossing a coin in either direction is a crapshoot unless one knows the emphasis each uses when granting the designations.
In business strikes, PCGS likes a certain "look". Basically blazing luster and monster cartwheel, or attractive toning. Either of those will put a technical MS65 coin in to an MS66 holder. NGC doesn't really seem to place as much emphasis on the "look" of the coin in this series. I think that may be because they have the star designation available as a tool and can use it when warranted, rather than a grade bump.
Russ, NCNE
That would be this one:
It was graded MS66 and I believe that, technically, NGC was correct in that grade. However, that coin doesn't (or didn't) have the "look" that PCGS, (or I, for that matter), likes.
It does now, though:
Russ, NCNE
PCGS has graded over 300 1969 Kennedys in Pr69 D/C. Ken's is one of the nicest I've seen. Mine is nice, and I've seen some for sale that I wouldn't want in my collection - all graded the same. Buy the coin and not the holder is some of the smartest advice I ever received.
Joe