Home› PSA Set Registry Forum

My Frirst Submission

kimo75kimo75 Posts: 263 ✭✭
in PSA Set Registry Forum
Pretty satisfied overall. Proves I still have an eye for quality! The 8ST on the
66 OPC must have been from the grader spilling his coffee.

Submission #: 4088522
Zip: 44512

Note: all are for sale except the Stargells

Comments

  • VirtualizardVirtualizard Posts: 1,936 ✭✭
    Sweet submission, Kimo.

    Sorry about the '66 OPC 8ST. I recently had a '72 OPC Stargell come back with the ST qualifier as well. After looking at it, there was a small wax stain on the back. I really didn't look at it that closely before submitting. Oh well, live and learn.

    Nice job, though!

    JEB.
  • kimo75kimo75 Posts: 263 ✭✭
    stain or not. i'm happy with an 8 on the opc. how is the opc rough cut looked at?
    I've got some others I'd like to see graded.
  • VirtualizardVirtualizard Posts: 1,936 ✭✭
    The rough cut is considered a "factory cut" and is not downgraded. Consequently, non-rough cut cards are probably scrutinized more closely for evidence of trimming. I prefer my OPC's to be a little fuzzy on the edges - it lets me know that I've got an original, unaltered card.

    "stain or not. i'm happy with an 8 on the opc."

    Unfortunately, the ST qualifier I received was on a PSA 6! image (I had submitted hoping for a straight PSA 7, but missed the wax stain).

    JEB.
  • Hockeybonkers99Hockeybonkers99 Posts: 115
    bgs is not kind to OPC cuts.

    hockeybonkers@yahoo.ca
Sign In or Register to comment.