Home› U.S. Coin Forum

Grade this walking lib.

PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum
Thinking about buying it for a type coin and not good at grading them.

Comments

  • kamehameha00kamehameha00 Posts: 2,077
    66?
  • jonesyjonesy Posts: 5,031
    Look's like a complete hand holding the bunch!! image
  • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    I guess ms66 is not unreasonable then?
  • jonesyjonesy Posts: 5,031
    I don't own Walkers. I do like them to have full hands instead of a flat garbled thing in the center. image
  • fivecentsfivecents Posts: 11,207 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS67 ?
  • FC57CoinsFC57Coins Posts: 9,140 ✭
    Old people like me need a slightly bigger pic - but I could live with MS66 image
  • puffpuff Posts: 1,475
    The pictures are a litttle blurry, and it would be hard to see any specifics such as die polishing, contact marks, or luster. But since I specialize in ms65 up Walkers here is my opinion, for what it's worth......

    The strike looks completely full, with fully struck head, full thumb seperation, and 95% fully split reeds. If there are "no" contact marks in the fields, and "minimal" in the devices, I think this Walker would grade minimum ms66 and possibly ms67.image
  • AndroidAndroid Posts: 726 ✭
    From the picture, I concur with MS66.
    We are finite beings, limited in all our powers, and, hence, our conclusions are not only relative, but they should ever be held subject to correction. Positive assurance is unattainable. The dogmatist is the only one who claims to possess absolute certainty.

    First POTD 9/19/05!!

  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS65 for slight rub.

    al h.image
  • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    Thanks all for the feedback. Pcgs graded it MS66.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...