Home PCGS Set Registry Forum

After three years of searching, I finaly found...

a PQ screamer 1954-P cent! This is unquestionably the finest 54-P I've ever seen. It has a FULL strike, FULL luster, and knock out eye appeal. 66.49 man.

David



image

Comments

  • fcloudfcloud Posts: 12,133 ✭✭✭✭
    Nice!

    President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay

  • gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Going by the scan,has a shot at MS67.Nice.Al
  • LincolnCentManLincolnCentMan Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭
    grip,

    Honestly, I've owned a LOT of PCGS 67's that werent this nice. I dont think PCGS would 7 it just because of the date. I've had a number of coins deteriorate (either in the mail or at PCGS) while in submission. I dont intend to send this one to PCGS any time soon.

    David
  • CocoinutCocoinut Posts: 2,512 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very nice for a '54-P (or just about any other date, for that matter).

    Did you find it as a single coin, or pick it out of a roll?

    Jim
    Countdown to completion of my Mercury Set: 1 coin. My growing Lincoln Set: Finally completed!
  • Its a Nice coin. Probably won't 67 but you can never tell from scans. Seems like the facial marks preclude the 67 but those fields are very nice.


  • Nice coin, where did you find it?
  • LincolnCentManLincolnCentMan Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭
    ...I bought it in a Heritage auction.

    David
  • Here are some pics of a 51-P in MS67RD


    Obverse

    Reverse
  • LincolnCentManLincolnCentMan Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭
    Very nice 51-P. The fields are sweet. There's a few non-focal ticks, but nothing significant. The only disterbance I see is on the reverse above the second S in STATES.

    David

  • Where'd the '51 pics come from? That's a nice coin as well!!!
  • >>>Where'd the '51 pics come from? That's a nice coin as well!!!

    That would be mine. Honestly the picture does it no justice. the luster is all but lost with the pic. The Pic is also very high res so it makes the few minor flaws stand out. Andy recently made a 51-P in 67RD as well and a board member was able to compare the two side by side and this coin was the nicer of the two. Gerry owns one of the other two but has not compared this one yet. Someday I will get around to sending it to him.

    "The only disterbance I see is on the reverse above the second S in STATES."

    You know its funny what a scan will pick up and miss. I can barely make out that disturbance with a 10X loupe yet the hit above "T" is all but gone.

  • Very Cool 1954 image and a Very Cool 1951 as well image
  • LincolnCentManLincolnCentMan Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭
    You know its funny what a scan will pick up and miss. I can barely make out that disturbance with a 10X loupe yet the hit above "T" is all but gone.

    I've noticed that to in some of my pics. I had a 30-S in PCGS 66 a while back that have a few light spots on them. They really werent that bad, but in the pic, they looked like specks of milk. I have found (with a slight degree of frequency) some disterbances on coins b/c of the pics I take. On the other hand, sometimes a tick or spot will completely disappear in a pic. It's weird how it works that way. That's why I try to post pics and discriptions when I sell. ...I figure between the two, everything should get covered.

    David
  • dpooledpoole Posts: 5,940 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That '54 is SWEET! Not sure about the technicals, but it sure has the 67 "look"! Spectacular!

    As for the '51 (*sigh*), well, that's sure purty. I just sent in a 51-P to the PCGS gods, to see if I get hit by a lucky lightning bolt.
  • gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That 51 was a slide in,has two many hits on the shoulder, and a few marks on the obverse.The 54 looks much cleaner,but is a smaller scan.I have "home made numerious 7's" and I still think the 54 has a good shot.Regardless,both coins are nice.Al
  • Congrats!!!
  • >>>That 51 was a slide in,has two many hits on the shoulder

    Remember you are looking at a coin blown up on your computer monitor. All of the shoulder "Hits" are as struck elements. The shoulder, being the deepest part of the Obverse die is a magnet for flecks of metal and hence damage to the die. It is rare indeed to find any wheat Lincoln with a "Perfect" shoulder. There are only 3 minor hits visible under 10X, on the entire obverse. 1 is on the nape of the neck another is just below the "S" in "Trust" and the last of the three is on the "1" in the date. The reverse has a grand total of 4 hits uner 10X. The only hit visible under a tensor lamp with the naked eye is the slight nick under the "S" on the obverse and small nick to the right of the left wheat ear. Its not a slider 67, it has a great strike for the date and in the submission it was submitted on had numerous PQ coins that are in for Presidential review because they were 66'd not to mention the 8 MS67's I had with this order from "easier" dates.

    Cheers,

    Brian

  • Let me join the fray with this 54P!! image
    image
    image
    The fields are imacculate on obverse and reverse. The only hit on the reverse in on the T in cent. Reverse is 67 with perfect O in one.
    Obverse has tick on shoulder and under eye. This coin is very bright unlike Heritage's lousy pictures.
  • Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,274 ✭✭✭
    Those are all super coins. So many high grade Lincolns have black spots on them, it's nice to see a group that's almost problem free.
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • Both great looking coins!
  • shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
    Congrats David, looks like a beauty.
  • I also have a really nice PQ 54P in MS66RD....but don't have any way of taking nice pictures that would show the detail. Andy made the coin.
    Marc
Sign In or Register to comment.