Agreed, the surfaces look "something", as lightly cleaned at some point and rather attractively retoned.
There sure is a nice strike, a lot of detail, and positive eye appeal. First approximation: Unc details, net AU55 (was going to say 53 but it's too pretty to be only a 53, imo)
I originally posted I felt there was just a bit of rub here and there. Tough to tell without rocking the coin around. I used the word molested as that covers a wide area. And also I don't like that word "molested."
Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
That is a darn good looking coin and I thank you for sharing. I'll agree with many before me, that for an accurate grade, one would have to have it "up close and personal". I'll say it should certainly go AU-55, with a fair chance of MS-62/3. I can sure see why you chose to keep that in your collection!!
I'm not a "professional" grader, but I think some of you guys are pretty "damn" good, considering you only have the pic's to go by. This coin is in the "raw" state. When I bought this coin a few years ago from a small local coin dealer it was in a PCI gold label AU-53 holder.
Since I collect Walkers I will probably sell this coin. I still have the label, (see attachment), but not the plastic.
Comments
I almost agree with Placid: BB to MS65
EVP
How does one get a hater to stop hating?
I can be reached at evillageprowler@gmail.com
EF+ value at the low end, MS63 at the high.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
There sure is a nice strike, a lot of detail, and positive eye appeal. First approximation: Unc details, net AU55 (was going to say 53 but it's too pretty to be only a 53, imo)
margin of error now +/- 5 points.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
I call it au55
rob.
Since I collect Walkers I will probably sell this coin. I still have the label, (see attachment), but not the plastic.
(unless the luster looks much better in-hand)
K S
K S