Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Grading observation between NGC & PCGS

What is your personal view between these two services? I recently submitted some walking halfs and others to NGC and the results where very
discouraging. I had two walkers that should have been graded higher than
MS-61 (1943-S)& MS-63 (1943) respectively and I'm waiting for a (1944-P) & 1893 Columbian to come back. Another case in point, a 1851 $5 Liberty Half that was returned from NGC with a BB denoting altered surface, then resubmitted to PCGS. The outcome was what I thought all along, slabbed as XF45.
I think PCGS grades coins more accurately and are more consistant than NGC. Also, have anybody noticed that NGC slabs a ton of American Eagles and you see them being pushed on that ridiculous show called Coin Vault.

My take is that these coins given the era and production used to make them would generally come from the mint as no less than MS-68 to 70 and I don't see why they (NGC) bothers to grade them the way they do. I could go on and on about this subject but want to hear from others on this.

Comments

  • Just more proof that NGC doesn't know what it is doing. Stick to PCGS only. PCGS coins are the best!
    WORKING ON SEVERAL MODERN SETS. PCGS COINS ONLY FOR ME!
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    I have always felt that PCGS is the premier grading service. Sure it may cost a bit more,

    may take longer to grade and is stricter. But quality of grading is what I seek and I will

    take the best every time. If I do buy a NGC coin, I hold my breath untill it crosses. However,

    I dont do that very often.
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    I find both services to be rather comparable. And both have some of the best graders that are living today working for them. But remember, you are paying for an opinion. And both companies have had wrong opinions before.

    BTW, PCGS has plenty of coins on Coin Vault. And it takes more than a few anecdotal experiences to guage to consistency of any service. Also you are incorrect on the MS-68 to MS-70 assumption. Most coins being produced as business strikes for the mint in the last 20 years won't grade 68 to 70. Commemoratives excluded, of course.
  • MadMartyMadMarty Posts: 16,697 ✭✭✭
    I have had great luck crossing moderns from NGC to PCGS. I'm 6 for 6 on PR67CAM AH Kennedy, and 3 for 5 on Proof Moderns (the ones that didn't cross were big buck coins). The only thing NGC over PCGS is that 1955-1964 are considered moderns and cost $6 a coin less to grade and get turned around in 15 days.
    It is not exactly cheating, I prefer to consider it creative problem solving!!!

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,198 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just more proof that NGC doesn't know what it is doing. Stick to PCGS only. PCGS coins are the best!

    Huh? That's proof? Remind me that I don't want you on my jury! image

    The two companies are roughly comparable with PCGS about a quarter to a half point tighter in most series. Without a doubt, there are overgraded, properly graded and undergraded coins in both of their holders. Which means that you can get a good deal, get a nice coin or get stuck no matter what you buy. Since quality and price is a continuum and not discrete, there are good deals and bad deals in both holders, no matter what the grade on the label says!
  • EVillageProwlerEVillageProwler Posts: 5,856 ✭✭✭✭✭
    TDN,

    Haven't you learned to ignore FoM by now? If not, you're probably the only person here who hasn't...

    EVP

    How does one get a hater to stop hating?

    I can be reached at evillageprowler@gmail.com

  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    NGC most often gives a coin the highest grade it will ever receive, the first time it is submitted. They are more consistent and reproduceable in this, than PCGS, but also a bit more liberal, by an average of one half to three quarters of a point, for MS coins.
    PCGS often undergrades by a point or two the first time, and you need to resubmit two or more times in order to get the coin in the holder it merits.
    Because of this one half point bias, PCGS coins of a given grade are a little more expensive (ok, sometimes a lot more expensive) than coins slabbed the same grade by NGC.

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • coinlieutenantcoinlieutenant Posts: 9,320 ✭✭✭✭✭
    TDN is right on in his assessment.

    NGC and PCGS are nearly comparable with PCGS being a bit tighter in most series. There is some very overgraded stuff out there in both series. I have found that NGC grades a bit tighter in some areas, especially in their awarding the CAM/DCAM designation IMO.

    I am very surprised Bear that a seasoned collector like yourself still relies on the services to justify their worth to you.

    "If I do buy a NGC coin, I hold my breath untill it crosses. However,I dont do that very often."

    Now, I dont want to anger the bear and that wasnt meant as a flame, I have seen some of the coins that you buy and they are all very nice, but they would be the same coin regardless if they were in NGC plastic or PCGS plastic.

    V.r,
    John
  • mdwoodsmdwoods Posts: 5,559 ✭✭✭
    NGC is consistent, there standards are slightly different than those of PCGS. PCGS is a bit tighter when it comes to hits on the coin. At least that is my experience.
    National Register Of Big Trees

    We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
  • wingedlibertywingedliberty Posts: 4,805 ✭✭✭
    The age old Coke vs. Pepsi debate. Both are great services and the only two for me. NGC turnaround time is better, otherwise the two services grade in an almost identical consistency. Its a fact.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The age old Coke vs. Pepsi debate. >>



    Cola sucks, coffee rules!

    Russ, NCNE
  • wingedlibertywingedliberty Posts: 4,805 ✭✭✭
    Ok, Russ, we'll make it Maxwell House vs. Folgers.imageimage


  • << <i>Just more proof that NGC doesn't know what it is doing. Stick to PCGS only. PCGS coins are the best! >>


    Here goes "CU"s marketing manager again!imageimageimageimage
  • Cola sucks, coffee rules!...I'm really liking this guy.....Ken
  • wingedlibertywingedliberty Posts: 4,805 ✭✭✭
    Fan of Moderns has only been collecting for about a month. I don't think PCGS is ready to hire someone who is still a minor.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>...I'm really liking this guy.....Ken >>



    That sure didn't stop you from kicking my ass on a snipe today! image

    Russ, NCNE
  • Im not saying dont buy the other services slabs, just dont pay PCGS prices!
    You can fool man but you can't fool God! He knows why you do what you do!


  • << <i>Fan of Moderns has only been collecting for about a month. I don't think PCGS is ready to hire someone who is still a minor. >>


    LOL, LOL, LOL,LOL,LOL,imageimageimageimage
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭


    << <i>What is your personal view between these two services? >>

    generally, coins slabed by either svc. equally look much better raw.

    K S
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭✭
    i am sure there are many great coins in ngc and pcgs holders and also their fair share of not so good coins in holders


    for me

    i buy the coin not the holder and if i see any coins that are not so good in ngc and pcgs holders i pass them by and never think of them again WHO CARES LOL

    BUT

    if i would see a great coin with extraordinary extraspecial eye appeal that walks and talks and sings to me
    and it is a ngc or pcgs holder then it is okie for me

    for all the other coins in pcgs and ngc holders i do not like well who cares!! LOL

    michael





  • << <i>Im not saying dont buy the other services slabs, just dont pay PCGS prices! >>





    << <i>Just more proof that NGC doesn't know what it is doing. Stick to PCGS only. PCGS coins are the best! >>



    We need more enthusiastic plastic collectors chanting this mantra, that way some of us can buy those nice PQ NGC coins at bargain prices - keeps the prices down, which when I'm buying, I'm certainly not adverse to.

    (BTW, selling your nice coins, whether PCGS or NGC isn't difficult, just look for someone who collects coins).
    Collecting eye-appealing Proof and MS Indian Head Cents, 1858 Flying Eagle and IHC patterns and beautiful toned coins.

    “It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” Mark Twain
    Newmismatist
  • I can tell you when it comes to grading Saints, PCGS is tougher
    Michael
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭✭
    << Im not saying dont buy the other services slabs, just dont pay PCGS prices! >>





    << Just more proof that NGC doesn't know what it is doing. Stick to PCGS only. PCGS coins are the best! >>



    We need more enthusiastic plastic collectors chanting this mantra, that way some of us can buy those nice PQ NGC coins at bargain prices - keeps the prices down, which when I'm buying, I'm certainly not adverse to.

    (BTW, selling your nice coins, whether PCGS or NGC isn't difficult, just look for someone who collects coins).
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭✭






    fountainheadgold
    Member

    Posts: 138
    Joined: Feb 2003
    Tuesday September 30, 2003 1:07 AM (NEW!)



    I can tell you when it comes to grading Saints, PCGS is tougher


    WELL WOULD you believe that there are many great saints in ngc holders?? i would be interested in them all the others i am not interested in


    lol


    also doctor would you believe thawt there are many greayt coins in ngc holders?? lol

    michael
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭✭
    have always felt that PCGS is the premier grading service. Sure it may cost a bit more,

    may take longer to grade and is stricter. But quality of grading is what I seek and I will

    take the best every time. If I do buy a NGC coin, I hold my breath untill it crosses. However,

    I dont do that very often.



    well i might not be as smart as you in coins but for me i alwaYS BUY THE COIN NOT THE HOLDER LOL

    but i guess to each his own

    michael


  • Well I have just as many saints in ngc holders as pcgs , i always buy the coin, that is why i have many ngc holders, but I do think all in all pcgs is tougher on saints
    Michael
  • and by the by I keep ngc coins in ngc holders
    Michael
  • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭


    << <i>BTW, PCGS has plenty of coins on Coin Vault. >>



    Are they selling pcgs PR or MS 70's? I have not looked at that show in along time.
    I checked their web site I see they are selling some.
    They even have a 1901-s barber quarter in a g4 pcgs holder for $4,850.95 s&h: $25.67. image

    http://www.shopathometv.com


  • << <i>Well I have just as many saints in ngc holders as pcgs , i always buy the coin, that is why i have many ngc holders, but I do think all in all pcgs is tougher on saints >>




    This has been my expierience, as a matter of fact, its how I ended up here! As soon as I started buying the higher priced Gold and realized there were a lot of fakes out there, I started putting more faith into the grading services. I soon figured out that when you lined them up, PCGS was the most consistant and conservative! I wont argue with NGC being number 2, but that didnt change the fact that they were a far cry from PCGS! Folks, what I saw was night and day, thats why I am so passionate about PCGS! Down the road, when I started collecting the Modern Gold, I saw the same thing!

    Having said that, you tell me what Im suppose to think! I come here and find collectors telling me the same thing about other series!

    You can fool man but you can't fool God! He knows why you do what you do!
  • Last four 1954P Lincoln Cents sold at Heritage were two PCGS and two NGC. All four MS66RD. The PCGS sold for $554 & $483 plus juice. The NGC coins sold for $64 plus juice each. Look at the images of both set of coins. It's a no brainer!! image
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭


    << <i>thats why I am so passionate about PCGS! >>

    passionate? you mean like, crazy-eyed, foaming at the mouth, drop your pants passionate?

    oops, thought that was fan-of-moderns babbling there for a second....

    K S
  • All my years collecting I'd have to say that overall, I like PCGS grading. I have some NGC pieces in my collection that were bought for eye appeal. EARLY NGC coins were pretty much on the mark, but then they seemed to really loosen up, I believe, to drum up business. All my nicest coins were bought in PCGS holders, or were very early NGC. This does not mean that I automatically pass on an NGC coin, I still look at everything.
    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
  • Since everyone is going to get their two bits in...I will too:

    I've found that NGC is usually about a quarter of a point tighter on the reverse and PCGS is usually about a half a point stricter on the obverse. However, in recent days, ANACS has really been tough on the third side of the coin. I agree, PCGS really seems harsh on any nicks on the coin; but NGC seems to really hate uneven toning while ANACS definitely has a blast white bias. Strike seems to be the dominant trait that PCGS is looking for while NGC really seems to value the eye appeal. Although, if the coin was minted in any year ending in a prime number....PCGS is always going to be the tougher service.

    Why do I even open these same old threads? Yes, I am the idiot.
    Go well.
  • In my experience, the only series that NGC has a consistent, reliable grading record on is Buffalo Nickels. But don't send it to NGC if it's toned!

    I'll take PCGS' grading in general over NGC any day. I'm not a fan of slabbed coins but if it's high dollar, PCGS is the way to go for accuracy and authenticity.

    Mojo
    "I am the wilderness that is lost in man."
    -Jim Morrison-
    Mr. Mojorizn

    my blog:www.numistories.com
  • pmh1nicpmh1nic Posts: 3,340 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Both are very good at authentication and spotting problems. They each grade to their own standards with NGC in my opinion grading more closely to the ANA standards.

    PCGS in many cases is stricter in it's MS grading. Stricter does not mean better and that stricter grading is in many cases reflected in the pricing as Baley mentioned.
    The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭


    << <i>ANACS definitely has a blast white bias >>

    i can confirm that, having discussed this issue w/ 2 of the anacs graders. your observation is dead-on.

    K S
  • DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    I feel pretty fortunate to have had the chance to work through several hundred coins with some of the NGC graders at an ANA seminar and listen to them dissect a coin, form a grade, and reach consensus. Having done that, I think lots of the commentary regarding the difference between PCGS and NGC's standards may be useful to the market, but it doesn't enter into the mind of the graders. They're just looking at coins and making an informed decision. Is it a good opinion? Yes, at both services. I'd feel pretty confident building a collection based on the opinion of either set of graders. I would still only buy coins I liked, but I have tons of confidence in their skills. Right now, PCGS is perceived as more strict. That means you'll likely pay a premium for a nice coin in their holder. IMO, if you're paying a premium for the holder, you'd better hope the service is grading to a tougher standard. For me, I've simplified my collecting habits to buying a coin I really like at a price I feel is justified by the coin. I truly respect the opinion of the professional graders, but in the end, I'm still spending MY money for the coin. They are often my advisors / instrustors / mentors, but never my chief financial officer.

    As for the difference between the standards, your perception of the two will be solely determined by your own internal grading standard (if you have developed your own). The grading teams at both services are comprised of very skilled coin people who typically have years of experience in and around the business. If one team calls a coin 65, and another calls a coin 66, why? Which is correct? What qualities did they value most? Which flaws bothered them most? What is the correct grade? Who got cheated, the submitter or the seller? Are the coins valued the same by the market? Would they receive the same grade on resubmission? Man I don't know, and really don't care.

    I know the people who evaluated the coin are GOOD, and can put me in range to make my own decision regarding value. Isn't that really all we want them to do? If you ask me, Q.David Bowers had it right when he implored collectors to use the holder only as a guide and make your own decisions.

    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭


    << <i>For me, I've simplified my collecting habits to buying a coin I really like at a price I feel is justified by the coin. I truly respect the opinion of the professional graders, but in the end, I'm still spending MY money for the coin. They are often my advisors / instrustors / mentors, but never my chief financial officer >>

    1 of the finest observations every spelled out on the forum. thanks, dheath.

    K S
  • Wolf359Wolf359 Posts: 7,663 ✭✭✭
    Strike seems to be the dominant trait that PCGS is looking for while NGC really seems to value the eye appeal.

    I concur! PCGS loves a great strike....

  • Has anyone looked at the 4 - 1954P Lincolns I mentioned????image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file