Help me make sense of this...
SportscardAdvocate
Posts: 57
As some of you may know, I am trying to bottom feed a 62 Mantle. This week I was excited that a GAI 5 was up for auction and I figured it would go for beneath SMR which means it may meet my financial limitations. I don't have any GAI cards so I thought it would be cool to get one and see what it looks like. I'd cross it over regardless. At the same time, the eBay search engine informed me of a PSA 6 for sale.
As the week passed, I saw these weren't getting much traffic, so I thought I might have a chance at the 6. So I set my snipes for both cards figuring it was unlikely I'd get both cards, and even if I did, I was lowballing so much I could sell to lmayer and still make money.
To make a long story short, or rather shorter, the GAI 5 went for $169.16 and the PSA 6 went for $169.49. A whopping premium of 33 cents for a PSA card graded one grade higher.
SMR is $170 for a PSA 5 and $275 for a 6.
Is it odd that a GAI card gets SMR and a PSA card hardly beats it despite being one grade higher? Now I can't figure out why this is. Both sellers have 1000 plus 100% feedback which in my mind resolves any credibility issues.
The GAI has a better scan but is included with a bunch of other cards that I think might annoy bidders. The 6 didn't even have Supersize but that may have been because the card wasn't that good.
My sense is that the 6 is a low 6 with what looks like an almost shorn left side. But the 5 doesn't look that much better. In fact I thought it might crossover into a 4 (VG/EX).
Finally, I'm sure that even if I'd pursued the 6 with a higher price (my snipe didn't even kick it it was so low), I would have pushed the price to over $200 and still wouldn't have gotten the card. I feel like contacting the buyer and asking what their max bid was, but it feels like lifting somebody's cards after no sees their raise. That's just not done.
Any thoughts?
As the week passed, I saw these weren't getting much traffic, so I thought I might have a chance at the 6. So I set my snipes for both cards figuring it was unlikely I'd get both cards, and even if I did, I was lowballing so much I could sell to lmayer and still make money.
To make a long story short, or rather shorter, the GAI 5 went for $169.16 and the PSA 6 went for $169.49. A whopping premium of 33 cents for a PSA card graded one grade higher.
SMR is $170 for a PSA 5 and $275 for a 6.
Is it odd that a GAI card gets SMR and a PSA card hardly beats it despite being one grade higher? Now I can't figure out why this is. Both sellers have 1000 plus 100% feedback which in my mind resolves any credibility issues.
The GAI has a better scan but is included with a bunch of other cards that I think might annoy bidders. The 6 didn't even have Supersize but that may have been because the card wasn't that good.
My sense is that the 6 is a low 6 with what looks like an almost shorn left side. But the 5 doesn't look that much better. In fact I thought it might crossover into a 4 (VG/EX).
Finally, I'm sure that even if I'd pursued the 6 with a higher price (my snipe didn't even kick it it was so low), I would have pushed the price to over $200 and still wouldn't have gotten the card. I feel like contacting the buyer and asking what their max bid was, but it feels like lifting somebody's cards after no sees their raise. That's just not done.
Any thoughts?
0
Comments
Just 1 possibility - Jeremy
However, the bidding pattern on the GAI card is very interesting. The high bidder seems to bid on quite a few mid-grade cards so he would be fine. But the second and third bidders are syzygy3.14 and kardz-r-us both of PRO graded fame. It is obviously not a shill bid and the seller is good but I have read so many negative things about those sellers that I would be tempted to suspect the worst if they won the card.
Website: http://www.qualitycards.com
Jeff