Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

More Morgan Crossover Grades Posted

   
LINE # CERT # COIN DATE DENOMINATION VARIETY GRADE
1 60123219 1879 S$1 MS64 (was NGC MS64) image
2 60123220 1899 S$1 MS63 (was NGC MS64) image
3 60123221 1921 S$1 Morgan MS64 (was NGC MS64) image
4 60123222 1921-D S$1 MS64 (was NGC MS64) image
5 60123223 1883-O S$1 MS63 (was ICG MS63) image
6 60123224 1891 S$1 MS61 (was ICG MS62) image
7 60123225 1896-O S$1 AU50 (was ICG AU53) image
8 60123226 1886-O S$1 XF45 (was ANACS AU50) image
9 60123227 1889-O S$1 MS61 (was ANACS MS62) image
10 60123228 1890 S$1 MS62 (was ANACS MS62) image
11 60123229 1895-O S$1 VF35 (was ANACS EF45) image
12 60123230 1888-O S$1 MS64 (was ANA MS64) image

Date Received: 07/03/2003
Date Shipped: 09/09/2003

Numonebuyer

P.S. Not a body bag in site. image

Comments

  • Options
    PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,301 ✭✭✭
    That 95-o's gotta hurt image
  • Options
    Yes it did, but just a little.

    Numonebuyer
  • Options
    ttt

    Last time through.

    Numonebuyer
  • Options
    dragondragon Posts: 4,548 ✭✭
    Do you realize that what you're spending in crossover fees and 2-way postage, you could just buy some of those coins outright already in PCGS holders?
  • Options
    I feel your pain but do think the outcome was pretty much to be expected on the "downgrades" (still nice coins though I am sure). Did you submit in the original holders? I crack every non-PCGS coin before submitting to PCGS so I know there is absolutely no bias perceived or real. I even shred and then burn the certs so I know PCGS agents haven't gone thru my trash and ascertained the original grades. (J/K) I just submitted a Heritage sold NGC MS64 that looked 64 in the scans but screams 62 or lower in person. 63 at best, IMHO. We shall see in a couple of months.

    I looked at a table of SEGS graded Morgans at the Anaheim show with an open mind, viewed the coins and not the holders. There were some nice examples but there is just no way I was going to pay damn near 66 money for a 64 sitting in a 65 holder or even if it was raw. Unfortunately, many dealers cling to overgraded certs. and won't go below gray.
  • Options
    You did great. You only lost one grade on most of the non PCGS coins. That's great. You also crossed six coins at the same grade which is incredible. You must have a great eye for coins and found those few properly graded coins in other slabs. Congratulations! image
    WORKING ON SEVERAL MODERN SETS. PCGS COINS ONLY FOR ME!
  • Options
    Responding to comments...

    Most of the coins that were crossed have been owned by me for at least a couple of years. It is only recently that I became interested in the PCGS Registry Set and thus the need to attempt the crossover.

    I am mostly happy with the results. The 1895-O was the one that really upset me, but other than that a pretty good result.

    The total cost for the crossover on this order was $211 plus my shipping costs to PCGS (approx. $9 since this was about one fourth of the package submitted). Since I already owned the coins in the slabs that I submitted, I felt the cost was worth it. To buy 12 PCGS-certified coins and sell the ones that I had takes time and time is money.

    Oh, by the way, I do submit them in their original slabs.

    Numonebuyer

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file