Is this title misleading?
SIRAMEDO
Posts: 80
I bid on Ebay on the following lot. The title on this auction was: 1973 Topps #180 Fergie Jenkins Cubs PSA 9 ( #2750888687). I was in a hurry and did not read the description on this card. After being the high bidder, I noticed that the description stated that the card was an PSA 9 OC qualifier. Is the seller correct in using this title on his auction? PSA9 is not the same as PSA 9 OC. I did wrong in not reading the description but I trusted the title. Am I incorrect?
What should I do now? Should I pay the auction or not? Is the seller correct using this title or not? Thanks for your comments. Siramedo.
What should I do now? Should I pay the auction or not? Is the seller correct using this title or not? Thanks for your comments. Siramedo.
I am always buying 1972 Puerto Rican League Stickers, 1948-49 Toleteros, 1949-50 Toleteros and 1950-51 Toleteros. e-mail pajoyeros@coqui.net
0
Comments
Website
Half the OC auctions these days do not list the OC in the title. I don't know why, but usually the description AND the scan show the OC. Surprising you would bid on a card without looking at the scan. Pay now, cheap lesson learned for later.
_________________
1956 Topps PSA 8's+(active)
1969 Topps PSA 8's+(retired)
1972 Topps PSA 9's+(active)
1973 Topps PSA 9's+(retired)
1986 Topps PSA Perfect(active)
1997 Flair Legacy's(active)
A PSA 9oc is really a PSA 7. Anyway, Thanks. Siramedo.
I've learned to look out for the sh$theads who don't list the OC in the title and waste my time looking at their garbage auction, the one's that really irk me are the guys who charge $6-10 for shipping and "handling" on a $20 card.
_________________
1956 Topps PSA 8's+(active)
1969 Topps PSA 8's+(retired)
1972 Topps PSA 9's+(active)
1973 Topps PSA 9's+(retired)
1986 Topps PSA Perfect(active)
1997 Flair Legacy's(active)
This brings me to a point I've been wanting to make for a while. The qualifier being on the second line like a variety or inessential desciptor seems to empower some sellers to leave it off in their listings. I'd propose that PSA start putting it right after the numerical grade like most people write it:
9OC
not
9
(oc)
I think that would make it easier to spot even in scans that are sometimes a bit small where the qualifier is strangely not visible, and tougher to ignore.
2005 Origins Old Judge Brown #/20 and Black 1/1s, 2000 Ultimate Victory Gold #/25
2004 UD Legends Bake McBride autos & parallels, and 1974 Topps #601 PSA 9
Rare Grady Sizemore parallels, printing plates, autographs
Nothing on ebay
The seller is an arse. Buy the card and learn from the mistake. I did it years ago and still had it happen a month ago on a 65 I won.
Dave
the seller you are talking about posts on this board and is heavily involved in the registry so maybe he can answer directly
It happens. Shame on the seller. I always look at the scan closely, now.
JEB.
I sure hope he has read all the boards and takes the time to reply for the benefits of all.
Im buying the card, but be sure it won't happen again.
Thanks all for your time.
Siramedo.
It reminds me of 2 weeks ago when my 8 year old son picked up my laptop computer while it was still on ebay. When I got back on later, I learned that I had "won" an auction for the DVD "Animatrix". Well, I had no desire to buy this DVD (my son had accidentally bid for me), but I paid for it with the idea that I would resell it immediately when it arrived. Well, it is now 4 weeks and no DVD. The seller said he mailed it the day after I paid him (he has 100% positive feedback). I believe the thing must be lost in the mail. Very frustrating!
1974 Topps Baseball PSA 8+
Knowledge speaks, wisdom listens
This is a lesson you shouldn't have to pay for. If the seller threatens negative feedback, you do the same. Tell him/her to stop playing games and wasting people's time.
Angry,
Satan
Advice doesn't get much worse than what you've just suggested. Have you ever considered climbing to a mountaintop and building a small hut?