Ridiculous Grading Result of the Day ...86 1c Cleaned
Manorcourtman
Posts: 8,057 ✭✭✭✭✭
Ok I am just about done with PCGS. This is the most ridiculous result I have ever seen. Sent in numerous moderns including a 1986 penny right out of a mint set and they body-bagged it for cleaning. I am not only ticked but insulted and feel like I have been fleeced by a out of control corporate monster. I destroyed a perfectly good mint set by cutting out this coin because I thought it would grade 68 and they insult me with a cleaning/no grade designation. I am p'd beyond belief. Cleaning on a 1986 penny???? How dumb of a proposition is that, unbelieveable in my opinion. I guess I am the fool for wasting my money with this company. Wasted a $20+ gorgeous mint set and paid $12 to be insulted. The sad thing is that the 86D from the same set was graded. If you'd like to see the result, check out submission # 3020742.
C.
C.
0
Comments
Yes, one can argue that since the US Mint did the "cleaning", the coin deserves to be slabbed. But, I can also appreciate the grading companies' desire to slab only coins which look "right".
The "cleaned" result seldom happens from these mint sets (it is certainly not the norm), but, it does happen from time to time.
Wondercoin
I've been there, but actually was my fault for dipping a couple coins. One thing I found that helps (sometimes) is cut the coin from the set, but leave it in the mylar packaging and place that inside the 2x2 flip. Don't give up. I said last time I was done sending in Ikes, and well... I've got another batch in at PCGS. The best I have ever seen. Should find out in a week or two. Hang in there
Ken
My Washington Type B/C Set
Micth is exactly right about the mint cleaning some coins. It really hurts to wait on pins and neeedles for 2 months and then get crappy grades - been there done that. You really have to be extremely careful cutting up mint sets and then sometimes when you cut it out it has something that you did not see resulting in a wasted mint set.
Of course, to those "investors" out there, my idea may make no sense at all, as one loses a certain amount of liquidity I suspect. But, as a true collector of your particular series, who cares if a coin you know to be killer PQ++ for the grade resides in a flip in your collection?
Wondercoin
They are supposed to grade coins, without knowing whose they are or where they came from. Yes, I know there are inevitable exceptions.
So, you might have a coin which you KNOW is original, but the grading service does not have all of the information that you do, upon which to render an opinion. Nor should they.
I don't think it would be fair to some submitters if others were allowed to lobby for getting a coin graded, by giving details of the history of a given coin or collection, in order to have it certified, when it would otherwise not have been. The playing field SHOULD be even, though it is not always so.
With the grading companies hypothetically grading coins in a vacuum, it means that some AT coins will get holdered and some original coins will get body-bagged - there is no practical and equitable way around those facts of life.
I had originally wanted to crack the coins out, but lacked the cohones to do so. At $2500 a piece, it is a little hard just to close my eyes and jump, not knowing where I will land. But, as I am waiting for my coins to be returned, I am thinking about jumping. It's just annoying that we have to play such games.