Options
Hoorah for a regrade
![numonebuyer](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/authoricons/MVC-643Fsmall_crop.jpg)
I have quite a few morgans at PCGS right now. Most for crossovers, a few for reholders and one for a regrade. I said to myself that this one was better than MS-63. So, I went for it. I was right. I just got checked the web site. An 1887/6 MS-64. Hoorah!
Numonebuyer
Numonebuyer
0
Comments
Numonebuyer
<< <i>I must have posted this at the wrong time. >>
Nah, just the wrong topic. It's too positive and is coin related. Just change the title to <insert person, place or thing> SUCKS! PCGS works particularly well as a target.
And, congratulations!
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
<< <i>I must have posted this at the wrong time. >>
Nah, just the wrong topic. It's too positive and is coin related. Just change the title to <insert person, place or thing> SUCKS! PCGS works particularly well as a target.
And, congratulations!
Russ, NCNE >>
Ditto what Russ said
why didn't pcgs get it right in the 1st place? they are the best, aren't they?
happy now?
K S
Excellent. Now the thread will get 100 replies and be on the first page for days.
Russ, NCNE
K S
<< <i>why didn't pcgs get it right in the 1st place? they are the best, aren't they? >>
The original PCGS slab was one of those real old (smaller) ones. I am no expert in the generations of PCGS holders, but the certification number WAS 7194923.
You have no idea how long I looked at that coin with the loupe and microscope and said to myself "this coin looks a lot better than an MS-63".
Numonebuyer
Registry 1909-1958 Proof Lincolns
Numonebuyer