Things I would like to see PCGS change.
MadMarty
Posts: 16,697 ✭✭✭
Ideas anyone! Personally the two biggies I have are:
Turn Around Time (I'm sure this is tops on everyones list!)
Make moderns go back to 1955 like NGC does. I would much rather send my late date Frankies and 64 Kennedys to PCGS, but 3 at NGC for the price of 2 at PCGS in 1/3 the time! See change #1...
Turn Around Time (I'm sure this is tops on everyones list!)
Make moderns go back to 1955 like NGC does. I would much rather send my late date Frankies and 64 Kennedys to PCGS, but 3 at NGC for the price of 2 at PCGS in 1/3 the time! See change #1...
It is not exactly cheating, I prefer to consider it creative problem solving!!!
0
Comments
Russ, NCNE
For some life lasts a short while, but the memories it holds last forever.
-Laura Swenson
In memory of BL, SM, and KG. 16 and forever young, rest in peace.
peacockcoins
A:
PCGS EMPLOY AT LEAST 3 OR 4 MORE GRADERS, ANOTHER FINALIZER, 1 MORE SLAB HELP,
1 MORE RECEIVING DEPT PERSON, 1 MORE SHIPPING DEPT PERSON, 2 MORE EFFICIENT GAL
FRIDAYS AND.................*POOF*.......THE PROBLEM IS SOLVED, THEY'RE MEETING OR EXCEEDING
NGC'S SERVICE, THUS MORE BUSINESS IS GAINED < HELLO GAINED, NOT LOST....THEN THE 2
MAJORS KEEP ON A TRUCKIN KEEPIN TEENY SUBMITTERS TO MAJOR SUBMITTERS HAPPY AT THE
SAME RATE...
LET'S SEE... THAT ABOUT 1.5 MIL TO 2 MIL IN SLAB FEES GAINED A YR TO COVER ABOUT 1.5 TO 2 MIL
NEW EMPLOYEE COSTS...HMMMMM...SO IT'S A WASH.....
B:
TELL YA WHAT ! WASH OR NOT, LETS KEEP IT LIKE IT IS, LOSING THOSE SUBMISSIONS, LESSENING,
LOWERING CUSTOMER (CONSUMER) CONFIDENCE IN AT LEAST THE SERVICE CATEGORY, THUS
INEVITIBALY BLEEDING OVER TO GRADING CONFIDENCE LEADING TOWARDS THE LOWERING OF THEIR
STANDARDS TO GET GIFT SUBS IN TO STAY AFLOAT IN SUB #'S PER YR, ETC,ETC..TO COVER IT LIKE IT IS
NOW IS SCENARIO "A"
I'M STILL OPEN TO GRADING EVERY PROOF COIN FROM 1936 TO 2003 @ $1.50 PER COIN. I CAN DO/THEY CAN FED-X ME ONCE A WEEK AND PICK UP FED-X THE PREVIOUS WEEK'S FINAL PRECISE GRADES ON
10,000 COINS PER WEEK. E V E R Y SINGLE COIN WILL BE EXACTLY AND PRECISELY GRADED E V E R Y
SINGLE TIME. CAM AND DCAM ATTRIBUTIONS WILL BE E X A C T WITH EVERY SINGLE COIN, E V E R Y
SINGLE TIME. AND...ALL CONSIDERATIONS FOR EACH DATE AND DENOM WILL BE APPROPRIATELY TAKEN
INTO CONSIDERATIONS GIVEN ALL THE VARIABLES OF EACH DATE/DENOM THAT MAY OR MAY NOT APPLY.
FULL TIME, 100% AND I WILL STOP ALL ACTIVITY WE DO AND COMMIT TO A MIN 5 YR CONTRACT.
THE PROOF 36 TO CURRENT MARKET WILL GET CORRECTED, EVEN THE BLUNDERS,GOOFS,GIFTS,GRADE REVIEWS,CROSSOVERS,"BUY OFF THE MARKET TOTAL FLUBS" AND THE WORST PROBLEMATIC OF ALL,THE
EVER CHANGING UP A COG/DOWN A COG RE-OCCURANCE OF AN ALWAYS CHANGING SAME GROUP OF
GRADERS NO MORE THAN MONTHS TO A YR OR SO WILL BE ENTIRELY ELIMINATED.
IS HE SERIOUS ?
YES....
If they won't holder EVERY coin then do not charge for the BB'ed coins. They are making enough money to be able to give the BB coins back without charging.
Get rid of modern grading tier so when we submit legitimate coins they can be graded faster than 3 months.
<<
i bet pcgs makes more $$$$ via the modern grading tier than any other tier.
btw, i would like to see an increase on the maximum value of a coin for the economy tier, from $300 to, say, NONE!
<< <i>>>
Get rid of modern grading tier so when we submit legitimate coins they can be graded faster than 3 months.
<<
i bet pcgs makes more $$$$ via the modern grading tier than any other tier.
btw, i would like to see an increase on the maximum value of a coin for the economy tier, from $300 to, say, NONE! >>
Possibly, but I would rather see PCGS spend the time grading coins of value than coins taken out of change jars that are marketed to rubes at prices only a con man could love.
<< <i>I would like to see EVERY coin holdered even if it is cleaned or AT and saying such on the holder.
If they won't holder EVERY coin then do not charge for the BB'ed coins. They are making enough money to be able to give the BB coins back without charging. >>
I am in total agreement and well stated. I wouldn't complain at all
at the choice they made above. If they went with the holder idea
I would at least feel as if I got something for my fee and could sell
the coin as is or break it out and chance another submission. PCGS
should be thinking along these lines. It would be a real plus for them either way.
My website