Home PSA Set Registry Forum

Offer from someone trying to help out with my set

Is this person serious with this proposition? I'm always willing to listen to offers for Raw examples,folks who plan to send cards in for me or people who want to buy or sell.However,this person has sent me the funniest offer that is so far out of touch with market reality I don't even know wether to take it seriously or not and have no idea how to respond but I tried to be as nice as possible when doing so.

Guess this is what I deserve for building a 1980 Topps baseball set.


Rob, I think that I can complete your set. I went through your listing and came up with the following: Cards Needed: 57 cards PSA 8 (Upgrade): 73 cards I won't list out the numbers because I had simply printed out the listing from the PSA website that you maintain in regards to your set, so we know what cards we are talking about. The good news is that when I bought the set in 1980, I have never taken them out of the box, but beyond that, these cards are pristine, very sharp, perfect corners.
Here is what I am proposing. I am going to remove the following card numbers from the set: 1, 4, 40, 100, 160, 206, 210, 230, 235, 265, 270, 393, 406, 450, 482, 500, 540, 580, 590, 600, 650, 700, 720. These are the "high dollar" cards that I am going to send in to get graded. I feel very strongly that the majority of these are 10's (including the Henderson). I will send you the remainder of the cards (703 cards).

The following would be the discounted fee schedule: for the 57 cards that are needed, we could be talking a fair value of $8 each (vs. $15 to $50). For the upgrades, we would be talking about $10 (vs. $15 to $50) per card. Hypothetically then the upgrades would total to $456 plus $10 per any applicable cards that are used for your collection (PSA 9 and 10). Assuming that you upgrade 1/3 of the 73 PSA's to 9's and 10's (althought I know it will more than likely be all 73), that would be an additional $243. Therefore, I am proposing to send you the set, less the cards that I had noted earlier, for a fee of $650. Let me know how you would like to proceed. I will send you the cards first to let you inspect them and make sure they are up to your standards before you make payment. I feel this to be a win win situation. On one hand you get to complete your set. On the other hand, I have the knowledge as a collector that it was my set that helped to complete PSA's all-time best set. I will need your mailing address to send these out right away. Do we have a deal? Please advise. Thanks, Mark



My reply:

Mark,I find it extremely difficult to take this seriously.I could be wrong but it appears that what you are interested in doing is - selling me a raw set, minus the "high dollar" cards for $650?
First of all,a raw complete set in respectable condition books for $120 and sells around $50 to $90.
Second,I have dealt with the smallest & biggest submitters to PSA for 1980 and other years.PSA just doesn't issue 10s to anything or anyone.If you really feel confident in your predictions for what the grades these cards you have will turn out to be then I suggest you send them to PSA and I'll be happy to pay the respected prices for each grade.
Good luck and let me know how you make out!
Regards,Robert




Comments

  • AlanAllenAlanAllen Posts: 1,530 ✭✭✭
    The scary part is, he took his own offer seriously! The guys writes well, and there wasn't a trace of sarcasm.

    JOe
    No such details will spoil my plans...
  • Rob

    A very professional reply to his offer . It could of been much more harsh. The problem is as many of us know everyone(who is not as familar with grading) thinks all their raw stuff is 10's. It usually takes a submission for them to realize most of their 10 gem mint stuff is PSA 7 PSA 8OC or worse
  • So, the "discounted fee schedule" is $8/card for raw??? I think this guy is in for a big suprise when he sends in the "high dollar" cards to PSA...

    I have some 1987 Topps sets still in the original boxes, never been touched. I wonder how many 10's are in there... image

    Robert
    Looking for:
    Any high grade OPC Jim Palmer
    High grade Redskins (pre 1980)
  • Well, at first I was confused, but ya, now it looks like wants to send you all the raw crap cards for $650.00. Why is he trying to charge you for the grading fee on cards you will have to pay to get graded. I still can't quite understand this wholly. image

    Doesn't gator deal with 80, or is it 81? he would know how hard it is to pull 9's and 10's from these years.
  • MeferMefer Posts: 1,162 ✭✭✭
    I won't name names but there is a well known dealer I e-mailed about a year and a half ago regarding needs for my 71 Topps baseball set. I was quoted graded prices for raw cards; most of the cards were commons. I can see maybe asking a little higher amount for raw cards from 71, but not graded prices (for example, I remember one common that was a "low population" card in 8 at the time was quoted to me at $40.00!) My thoughts are if the seller is so confident the cards will get the grade, send them in! While I believe sellers can charge whatever they want for cards, I personally refuse to pay graded prices for raw cards; the seller must assume any risk that I might hit a high grade.
  • GATOR5GATOR5 Posts: 654
    Rob,

    I'm so confused I don't know what to say for I'm still trying to figure it out.

    Boy I guess I shouldnt have gave you those commons if thier worth 10-15
    dollars raw.image

    Though not to laugh to hard I'd take him up on the offer to view the cards
    for anything is possible. It could be a freak deal though not likely. You just never no they could have been pulled from a razor
    case and if they haven't been touched who knows.
  • gemintgemint Posts: 6,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    More and more dealers are trying to get 'graded' prices for their raw cards. Why should the buyer assume the risk that the card won't grade out what was expected when there's no upside if it meets the grade? It's even worse with the 1980 deal. There's no shortage of pack fresh inventory out there and it's hard to justify spending $5/common to grade that set let alone essentially paying double the grading fee.

    By the way, if Mark is interested, I have a whole set of high grade 1980 Topps that I'll be happy to sell him for $650. I'll even throw in all the superstar cards!
  • mikeschmidtmikeschmidt Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭
    If you can get some sort of guarantee as to the grades you are willing to purchase, and the prices you will pay for each grade, perhaps you can make a mutually beneficial arrangement.

    E.G. Tell him you will offer him $x for PSA 8, $y for PSA 9, and $z for PSA 10 -- and that you will commit to those prices for the cards you need.

    MS
    I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
  • GATOR5GATOR5 Posts: 654
    Gem,

    I agree and I'm not saying there is a shortage of unopened or mint cards from 80 but
    if someone told me they would send me the set first to check them out who's to lose
    not you for you will get to see them before the purchase. I've seen a couple of raw
    sets in my day that have blown up the pops with 10's. Also if you have the cards in
    hand you can counter with another offer.

    I guess you have to have the eye to be able to make the judgement call. But your
    talking a buck a piece on the cards and a ten can turn into 50 and even more in some
    team set collectors. So I cant see where it'd hurt to take a look at them. For 20 tens
    and you have your cash back and then some. Case being are they mint.
  • RobERobE Posts: 1,160 ✭✭
    Marc,Matt and everyone else.....I would leave this alone.I've had many inexperienced people send me GEM MINT cards to inspect which I wound up returning and it always costs.I think I have about $35 worth of return shipping costs I paid from characters like this guy.

    Now on the other hand, if Marc or Matt offered for me to inspect a lot of cards that would be an offer I'd consider taking seriously.

    Otherwise that $35 or for $20 more for past stunts could have paid for a PSA 10 common which I'd much rather obtain.


    On another note I am very reluctant in my picks because Steve Creason sent as a throw in a Winfield EX 5 which is very comparable to 8's and even up to 10s.It has the usual print dots that particular card has which I've seen on a handfull of actual 9s but Steve says it has a Wrinkle on it.I've been looking at this card for 6 months where he says on the back of it and I can't see the freakin thing.I do see what appears to be a very teeny tiny surface wrinkle on the top right but you have to look under a good light and magnifier in order to see it.The corners and centering is just as good as a 9 and I have a few 9s that don't look as good.Also this card blows away quite a few 8s.


  • RobERobE Posts: 1,160 ✭✭
    image

    Also I must say that Steve Creason had nailed quite a few 10s from this year and knows what he was looking for in a card.He was always dead on and predicted his grades accurately pretty much 95% of the time.He also knew this was a problematic card and was right about it too.

    I have tons of thsese cards and still can't get it right.But then again my last submission I predicted 11 7s the rest 8s and no 9s.I wound up with 13 9s one 7,2 MC and the rest 8s.I was happy and upgraded many 8s since.

    Still skeptical
  • GATOR5GATOR5 Posts: 654
    Rob,

    I here ya I'm just a gamblin man and return shipping to me is just part of the game.

    As for your winfield 5 I have a few psa 7's that I have no explanation for usually due
    to 2 specks of snow only if you use the loupe and sometimes what I have found if
    you pull them from wax its usually gum dust. I've broke some holders only to have
    that be the cause. My stupidity 6 bucks for not cleaning my card wow!!!

    On the other hand you'll get there and I'm pullin for ya!!!!!!!!!!

    For I'm about ready to go into my final phase on the 81's I'm back into rehashing through
    all my 5000 counts. Finding quite a few to fill the gaps. Yet I must say this set is really
    getting to be work and not pleasure!!!!!!!!!
  • GATOR5GATOR5 Posts: 654
    Whoaa,

    Nice 5 I'll take all them at a buck a peice. I don't understand that wrinkle
    or no wrinkle.
  • RobERobE Posts: 1,160 ✭✭
    Matt,I'll send it to you and an 81 PSA 8 Kingman. image

    It's the least I could do for your past generosity.

    Address please!
  • Having been through several of these incidents, you know I think these guys are just scam artists. This guy has no cards, and is trying to exploit your desire to finish your set. I congratulate your professional response - I tend to be a bit more blunt when dealing with bozos.image
    I need that 69 Bench ASimage

    image
  • purelyPSApurelyPSA Posts: 712 ✭✭
    Rob -

    I figured you could use that Winfield as an example of what can go wrong even with high quality cards. Good to see you keep it handy.

    Steve
  • PROMETHIUS88PROMETHIUS88 Posts: 2,885 ✭✭✭✭✭
    why even take the chance of having them sent to you for inspection. you open up a can of worms if they are to be returned. who's to say he isn't going to claim that you replaced his "gems" with some other cards when/if you send them back?? besides, you can go to a show and pick out nice cards and have more to choose from without paying $650 for the set.... minus stars. if he is so confident they are all 10's, then he would send them in. he can't say that he doesn't "believe" in grading because he is sending in the stars. i agree that if indeed he does send them in he is going to get back a boxfull of psa 8's!! and that's if he used his magnifier! besides, if he really thought they were so great, he would have picked some of the low pop commons and sent them in as well. only other suggestion is offer to meet him at a show and inspect the cards. that way you are both protected!! that's my 2 cents! good luck with whatever you deceide!!!
    tim
    Promethius881969@yahoo.com
  • His offer is no more or less moronic that someone building a 1980 graded set in the first place.

  • GATOR5GATOR5 Posts: 654
    HMMM-------------------------------------------


    Ironic, wait and see as for 81's goooooooooooooood luck for your going to find some cards alot tougher than vintage trust me. HHHHHHHHHHHHHMMMMMMMMMMMM Try a lynn in a 9 good luck bust open 2000 dolla no holla.

    ps that means burn 2k on unopened to find nothing.


  • Why don't you both just donate the money to charity or something? Why do you need to waste thousand of dollars to grade cards that cost 25 cents each? At the end of the day, about 99% of the collecting world will look at your cards and think its a nice overproduced set with a boatload of ungraded material still out there. We're talking bloodbath when/if you decide to sell. There was a 1956 set that was struggling to get a $50,000 bid and you two morons are plowing $5,000 each into grading overproduced junk! Hello, McFly!

    If you donate the money, you will at least get a tax donation. If you donate to the right charity, maybe they will put your names on something. Why can't you just compete to see who can donate the most money? Send your money to feed someone in a third world country with nothing to eat. Which is more important: Having PSA arbitrarily assign grades to your overproduced cards or saving someones life?
  • mcastaldimcastaldi Posts: 1,235 ✭✭✭
    I have a similar story - but in the total opposite direction!

    In building my 75 set - along with both pursuits of the 72 set - I'd done occasional eBay business with Mark Wingard (eBay ID - jjtmmw@aol.com). When my 75 set registry showed I was down to five cards, I got an e-mail from Mark letting me know he was able to find two of them which had a legit shot at PSA8s. He said he’d submit them and e-mail me with how they turned out and he’d set them aside for me – and – sell them to me at a very fair price. A few weeks go by. . .one came back an 8 NQ and the other a 9PD. Even though I really can’t use the 9PD, I felt great buying both cards. Just the fact that I had a dealer/collector out there who really cared about helping me out made me feel really good. He knew he could have charged me a lot more – and he knew I’d have paid it. Because when you get down to those last cards, you become a lot less concerned with price.

    So. . .I have to say when you get close to finishing your set and people offer to “help”, not all of them turn out like RobE’s experience. And most definitely, you should bid on Mark’s eBay auctions – a great dealer and truly class act!

    Mike
    So full of action, my name should be a verb.
  • mcastaldimcastaldi Posts: 1,235 ✭✭✭
    Chico> That's funny. . .once upon a time people were saying exactly the same thing about 71 and 72 Topps Baseball. Yet you see fit to collect those sets encased in plastic with grades arbitrarily assigned by PSA. I think it's truly unfortunate that you miss the real beauty of the hobby we share - that there's more than enough stuff for everyone to collect cards that make them happy. Whether you're building a 56 set in all PSA9 or a complete 1990 Donruss set in all PSA7 - either way, if those are the sets that make you happy then God bless ya and good luck.

    Mike
    So full of action, my name should be a verb.
  • I think it's truly unfortunate that you miss the real beauty of the hobby we share

    I may miss the real beauty, but I didn't miss the beautiful bloodbath you took on the original mcastaldi 1972 PSA 8 chase. 1980 & 1981 graded Topps sets will be a gruesome sequel!
  • mcastaldimcastaldi Posts: 1,235 ✭✭✭
    chico> What makes you think the original partial set went at an overall loss, much less a "beautiful bloodbath"?

    Good luck with your 72 Topps set. When you get to the tougher cards, let me know. I'll be glad to lend you a hand.

    Mike
    So full of action, my name should be a verb.
  • MCASTALDI,

    O.K. I will bite. How did you make out on the 1972 set round 1? Rough estimate is fine.
  • mcastaldimcastaldi Posts: 1,235 ✭✭✭
    Chico> Rough estimate. . .I pretty much broke even. Some stuff went higher than expected and some lower. Better than half the cards were obtained either from my own submissions or I got them in trades for cards I'd submitted. In many cases, I'd trade away 9s from my submissions in return for multiple 8s. Because I was able to keep the costs down, I didn't need to sell for blockbuster prices to avoid getting hurt. This was also a time when you could count on getting an absolute minimum of $8-$10 for PSA8 commons. Obviously those days are gone.

    Mike
    So full of action, my name should be a verb.
  • Chico, relax man, if I didn't know any better, I'd think you and Ranch were the same person, so negative about things. If he wants to grade that, it's his choice, yes, he puts himself up for scrutiny for starting this thread on a public board, but he was asking for opinions on this situation, not whether or not he is retarded for grading an 80's set. And no, I don't know you and don't wish to feud with you. image
  • About 18 months ago I received an offer from someone I didn't know and still don't!

    This is what happened: I was emailed an offer to help me with my 61 set. The offerer sent scans of 6 raw cards, (nice scans). 4 cards were high #'s, the smr at the time was $50.00 in an 8. The other 2 were #'s in the 400's, smr was $22-23.00 in an 8. I paid this person $65.00 for the 6 raw cards.

    I send the cards in on a 25 card submission, $10.00 a card. The 6 cards pull 3 8's(2hi#'s 1 #450) and 3 7's. I trade one 8 and one 7 to Buckwheat. I trade one of the other hi #'s, an 8 to Alan (ACOWA). 4-5 months later I receive a letter from the person I bought the cards from. He stated his pc crashed and he wanted his graded cards. I was totally taken off guard by his demand, not knowing what he was talking about.

    6 months later I start selling cards from the set that I've upgraded. This person sends me an email calling me eveything from a liar to a crook. His final quote was " I bet your Mother didn't even die last year". He said I was selling his cards on ebay. Wrong!! I'll backtrack for some clarity. After he sent me the cards and I in turn sent them in for grading, my Mom had a stroke. My Mom passed away Feb. 28, 02.

    This guy emailed me once a week asking if I had received the grades for the cards. I explained my situation and that I wasn't very interested in getting the cards back, I had many other things going on in my life more important...

    A few months later, this person emails me with a threat. "I'm coming east in a month or so and want my cards". I laugh...he never shows, tell me I'm suprised.

    I still have one of each card he sent me (not the exact card) one hi # 8, one hi# 7 and one 400# in a 7. If he hadn't been such a jerk I would have tried to work something out with him. BTW all 6 cards are commons.

    WHAT SHOULD I DO???? WHAT WOULD ANY OF YOU DO???
    mxer
    ______________
    61 topps 100%
    63 topps
    54 topps
    51-present mvp's 100%


    image

    ______________
    1961 topps 100%
  • WabittwaxWabittwax Posts: 1,984 ✭✭✭
    As for 1980 Topps, it's a great set. I've opened 3 cases so far and they are tougher than you think to get a lot of 9's and 10's are really tough. I've got about 12 PSA 10's from those cases and that was 36,000 raw cards! Also at the rate that the Set Registry is going, 1980 will be a decent investment. Most people don't realize that at it's current rate, in 5 years there will be hundreds of people making each set. There will always be a buyer for many cards that some people think are a waste of time. Not that you will make a ton of money from breaking up your set, but enough new people are starting new sets each day that recovering your money won't be that hard. Plus Rob's got some really monster PSA 10's from that set.
  • RobERobE Posts: 1,160 ✭✭
    Well,it's no secret that I am crazy for trying to put this set togethor and if the time ever comes where it has to be sold...looking at the figures I'll probably break even from the way things were set up.

    However,I didn't build this set with the thought of trying to strike it rich nor did I expect to.I did it for the fun,the friends I've made with it and the learning experience in building a PSA graded set.Several times I thought about letting it go but now only being 57 cards short from complete I figure to hang on and finish what I started before a selling decision is made if one ever is.As well, there are plenty of folks who visit the set and chuck emails either looking for something,maybe to offer something (like this Mark guy did) or to simply appreciate it's existence.


    On my part there is no regrets for putting the set togethor despite what a guy thinks that builds any other set.Nomatter what anybody thinks I am not hurt by the points made and appreciate the view on the matter which I've often joked about how crazy it is too.But it's just crazy fun and a 1980 Topps set is certainly no threat to society and neither is my insanity for picking this as my first to give a shot.

    Now the point of this topic was to just share one of the comical emails I received from someone interested in helping,yes.And I did realize that it was going to open up a door for criticism which I don't mind when it's constuctive or even harsh.

  • gameusedhoopgameusedhoop Posts: 3,588 ✭✭✭✭
    Chico, you rip on others for putting together sets that you feel that they will take a "bloodbath" on, but you are working on a 86-87 Fleer Basketball set in PSA 8? Talk about a losing proposition unless every card is your own submission, during a $5 special. Try selling that puppy for a profit when you are done. Let people collect whatever they want, if they sell it for a profit, GREAT. If the stuff gets passed down to another generation, EVEN BETTER. If they derive enjoyment from putting the set together that should be all that matters, and you should keep your opinion to yourself. Good luck with your sets.
  • mikeschmidtmikeschmidt Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭
    <<lso at the rate that the Set Registry is going, 1980 will be a decent investment. Most people don't realize that at it's current rate, in 5 years there will be hundreds of people making each set. >>

    Unfortunately, I do not think any collectors believes that the Set Registry Growth rate will maintain its current pace. There are still NUMEROUS sets from pre-1970 where there are less than two dozen people currently making serious attempts at building the sets in graded form, Near Mint or better.

    If there is a day in five years that there are "hundreds of people" making each set, like the 1980 Topps set, I will retire a rich man. By that day, five years from now, my 1955 Bowman set will probably be worth millions.

    image
    I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
  • RedHeart54RedHeart54 Posts: 2,279 ✭✭✭
    motocrosser-

    Uhh, it seems that the deal was closed with that guy the minute he cashed your check.(???) Why exactly did he want the cards back? Did he think YOU were paying HIM for the privilege of sending HIS cards in? Just checking to make sure I'm not missing anything.
  • I usually pay under the grading fee for each common 1986-87 Fleer Basketball psa 8 card that I buy. For 1972's, you can get a large chunk for $5 or less. I buy the cards that people were expecting nines on. For these issues...if you don't get a nine, your submission was probably a losing propsition.

    I don't see how someone is going to get $4,000 or more for a 1980 Topps set. That's just the grading fees alone . These morons are ripping through unopened cases which probably drives the actual cost much higher. Call me crazy, but there are better uses of money than having PSA annoint a 5 cent common with a grade.
  • LJB17LJB17 Posts: 252 ✭✭
    Chico,

    I think Rob is very aware of the current market for 1980 PSA cards and he often picks up 8s at below grading fees because others were expecting 9s or 10s as you alluded to. I see nothing wrong with putting together this set and I am pleased to say that some of the cards in it are from my submissions. Rob has been nothing but pleasant to deal with in the past and he is currently helping me track down a 1980 Ryan in high grade. I know that not all 8s and 9s are created equal and i therefore deferred to Rob to find me a nice one which he has graciously accepted. When this set is completed I believe it will rate up there with some of the better set building accomplishments out there. It will obviously not have the value of Marc's 55 Bowman set, but that does not take anything away from the accomplishment. I think these cards with the blue backs are a great examle of what I wish collecting still was today. No inserts aside from a few highlight cards that have always been there and I believe this or 1981 were the last year of the great team cards.

    As has been said before, let people collect what they want. Just because you may not see the point does not mean you need to rip another. In a sense, we are all rather foolish to have a third party encase our little pieces of cardboard at $5-$50 per.
    Looking for 77 cloth 9s and 10s.
    54 Red Hearts
    and now 64 Stand ups
  • gemintgemint Posts: 6,109 ✭✭✭✭✭
    At one time, people thought we were morons for grading out vintage commons. Now some commons command higher prices than the superstar rookies. People thought I was nuts when I started grading out the commons from my 1969 set. At that time, nobody had registered a post 1956 set on the registry and you would likely only see 5-10 graded commons from a given set on eBay at any given time. The point I'm trying to make is the hobby is always evolving. Maybe the 1980 graded set will be a losing proposition. Maybe not. As long as the collector enjoys building the set for fun, then why knock him? Remember, most all of us started out as purely collectors in the beginning.
  • RobERobE Posts: 1,160 ✭✭
    Chico,I understand where you are coming from.Like I said this set wasn't built for striking it rich.It is crazy but in many cases I've done pretty well with obtaining cards at reasonable prices.At first though I did overpay for a handfull and I chalk it up to experience for set building.

    It's not as bad as you make it sound either.Sure,there are better sets to invest time and money into but that is not why I did it.

    Two key reasons this set is put togethor.1) It's the first run of cards I ever put togethor on my own without my father,who helped me with my 75 to 79 adventures and the memories of that period of time as a kid.For example,it was the first time my father coached our baseball team and from 80 to 83 we lost 4 games.We had a little dynasty going.Then in 84 I moved up to another league where we lost every single game and the coach quit.My father was out of coaching,took over the team and we came back all the way from last place and won the champoinship.It just so happens that in 1980 is where things started independently for me as a collector and I was given a partial vending case for working for free at the refreshment stands when the season ended.

    Sure it is meaningless to you and everyone else but to me all that nonsense is priceless and these cards capture that period in my life just well for me.

    Again,I really appreciate your blunt point and it's well taken but keep in mind this set was built for the experience and the memories.

    MS- I hope you do retire with 7 figures in the bank + interest with all your efforts and that set you choose to keep hidden. image









  • It's crazy if someone is tying up their kids college fund in a graded 80 Topps set (or heck, any set from the '80s - or for that matter, baseball cards period).

    It's perfectly sane if someone who has plenty of food on the table decides he wants to collect something that he enjoys. More power to him!
    Why do I get the feeling, that some cards are worth money, while others are not?
  • WabittwaxWabittwax Posts: 1,984 ✭✭✭
    I think the registry can grow at it's current rate. As the current registry participants complete sets, what will they do? Quit collecting? No, they will start new sets. I do a lot of local card shows and raw collector's are always asking me about PSA. There is a huge amount of serious set collector's who have never heard of the set registry or just haven't participated yet. The registery along with these message boards are very addicting once people dabble in it. There is far far more upside in the market right now than downside. IMHO.
  • RobERobE Posts: 1,160 ✭✭


    << <i>It's crazy if someone is tying up their kids college fund in a graded 80 Topps set (or heck, any set from the '80s - or for that matter, baseball cards period).

    It's perfectly sane if someone who has plenty of food on the table decides he wants to collect something that he enjoys. More power to him! >>



    No kids at this point for pre school let alone college.On and off for 17 years with the same girl and if we were going to have kids they'd be grown up by now.

    Also,there is plenty of food around here for this Italian and it's not only on the table. image Actually,there is 40 lbs more of me than say 2 years ago.I should weigh about 165 to 175 but I'm pushing 200.image

  • VarghaVargha Posts: 2,392 ✭✭
    My kids' college fund is called "The first 2 years are at a JC and you better get a job as well".
  • mcastaldimcastaldi Posts: 1,235 ✭✭✭
    David> Earlier this week I consolidated my student loans. Noone can tell me that education doesn't last a lifetime image

    Mike
    So full of action, my name should be a verb.
  • Redheart 54...

    You have the picture correct! I don't have a clue what someone like this guy is thinking. He's like a card collector stalker.

    Check out the SGC registry for 61 topps. I cracked every card I have on the site, I only have the flips from the holders. I thought it would be a joke to add to SGC. This guy has gone so far as to shadow my set card for card. I don't know how someone can add a ficticious set to the SGC registry, this guy did it. My set is #1 with about 4% complete. He is # 4 with the same gpa but not one card listed in the set.

    I'm putting many upgraded cards on ebay Sunday, also the one's he thinks he owns. I will prepare for death threats...no joke!
    John/mxer
    ____________
    61 topps 100%
    image

    ______________
    1961 topps 100%
  • AlanAllenAlanAllen Posts: 1,530 ✭✭✭
    You guys are being WAY too nice to this Chico troll.

    Joe
    No such details will spoil my plans...
  • CreeperKatCreeperKat Posts: 393 ✭✭
    I agree with most of you that card collectors should collect whatever they enjoy. To say that grading modern sets is a waste just because it is not "vintage" would be very much like saying the same for building a Joe Jay Player set, 1972 Angels Team set, or one of the other many sets available. Personally, I'm working on Angels Team sets and while they do not have many stars (lucky for me), I enjoy collecting them and learning a little bit more about the history of the team. As long as it keeps the hobby active, grade whatever you want.
    Looking for Los Angeles/California/Anaheim Angels in PSA 8 or better
Sign In or Register to comment.