Home PSA Set Registry Forum

Crossover depression

Just got back my 1st crossover group (in holders) and have to share my sad results.
Invoice # 4041391. These were all SGC's except the last was an FGS 10 (that cost me $6).image
It can't be good if 3 of 19 can't make a straight crossover. I think I'm going back to the old self-breakout/submit method. Anyone else less than thrilled with the experience?

EJ
"...life is but a dream."

Used to working on HOF SS Baseballs--Now just '67 Sox Stickers and anything Boston related.

Comments

  • ejguruejguru Posts: 617 ✭✭✭
    Almost forgot my second crossover invoice:
    # 4071655. The Brock was another FGS 10 job--gotta love them!image

    Of the others, 2 SGC's 92's crossed as 8's and the other 2 didn't crossover straight. Again, I can live with 92's turning into 8's, but ALL THE TIME?image So of the 5 SGC 88's, I get 3 PSA 8's back. The sad part is that I must have AT LEAST 50-100 cards whose label says PSA 8, but the cards would get PSA 6 if submitted today. I'm sure if I brought one of those dog ears in seeking a refund, I'd be sent on my way convinced it really is worthy of an 8, without the refund.
    "...life is but a dream."

    Used to working on HOF SS Baseballs--Now just '67 Sox Stickers and anything Boston related.
  • toppsguntoppsgun Posts: 787

    I've always been a "self-breakout/submitter" myself, but on my last invoice (March'03), I threw in two SGC cards at the bottom of complimentary invoice (PSA submission vouchers). I included a note "OK to crackout" and they did so. Both '67 Topps BB. SGC 88 Wickersham and SGC 96 Atlanta Aces both crossed to MINT 9.

    Based upon your post and my results, I think I'll retire undefeated and unscored upon. I'll forever be a "self-breakout/submit" kinda collector.
  • ejguruejguru Posts: 617 ✭✭✭
    Michael: Are you slipping the graders juju beans or something? That's pretty sweet. I am even more convinced that is is "just me" that gets scrooged! Ahh paranoia!
    "...life is but a dream."

    Used to working on HOF SS Baseballs--Now just '67 Sox Stickers and anything Boston related.
  • toppsguntoppsgun Posts: 787
    Far from it. The rest of that comp invoice was exactly what I paid for it. Zedro. Mostly five's, sixes and qualifiers, but they were all raw submissions of a few '61s I tried to sneak by the graders. Guess the garbage made my two crossovers look good.

    ...hey?? I may be onto something. I feel a theory coming on.
  • srs1asrs1a Posts: 398
    ejguru,

    I don' t think you should be in a cross-over funk -- almost 85% of the first invoice crossed, which isn't bad at all. As you know, my 68's are taking a similar voyage as yours, but in reverse.

    And , I think you are right -- time is a big wildcard and, in general, a brutal punisher. I would expect that all of your SGC cards were in their newer holders to cross this well.

    I think that the moral to the in-holder x-over story is that PSA is tougher than SGC which is tougher than GAI which is tougher than PSA...and on and on. What a business!










    Dr S. of the Dead Donkeys MC
  • WabittwaxWabittwax Posts: 1,984 ✭✭✭
    Toppsgun, I try to use that theory all the time. If I have a nice card that has a shot at a 9, I'll submit another one of the same card with it that is a real solid 8 but probably won't get a 9. I figure that if they put an 8 on one of them then they might put a 9 on the nicer one since they aren't the same quality. A lot of times it will result in 2 8's though so I don't know how effective that method is, but it doesn't hurt to try. Sometimes I'll get 9's. Also when I submit modern cards, I will submit them on a bulk modern invoice with about the first 75 cards being cards from the 70's and all the modern cards being at the end of the invoice. I figure after the grader seeing all the flaws that are common with older stuff, the new stuff looks pretty good. I do get a lot 10's that way. It might just be because I'm getting a better eye though so I don't know how effective that method is also.
  • FBFB Posts: 1,684 ✭✭
    EJ,

    What does the M/G stand for on the invoice? Thats not a set of initials that I recognize.
    Frank Bakka
    Sets - 1970, 1971 and 1972
    Always looking for 1972 O-PEE-CHEE Baseball in PSA 9 or 10!

    lynnfrank@earthlink.net
    outerbankyank on eBay!
  • sjjs28sjjs28 Posts: 442 ✭✭✭
    My first step into the cross-over river was successful.
    four cards attempted (my invoice #4070372)

    1968 Carlton - SGC96 to PSA 9
    1961 Golden Press Traynor - SGC96 to PSA 9
    1951 BlueBack Ashburn - SGC88 to PSA 8
    1963 Mantle - SGC88 to PSA 8


    I'm ready to play again!

    Steve Saldutti
    sjjs28@comcast.net
    Collector of 1964 Topps Stand Ups, 1965 Embossed, 1968 Topps Game and 1969 Topps Decals
    Registered Sets: 1964 Stand Ups, 1965 Embossed, 1968 Topps Game, 1969 Topps Decals
  • sjjs28sjjs28 Posts: 442 ✭✭✭
    Frank - those initials stand for (M)inimum (G)rade.

    They are provided when you ask to crossover another venders card to the corresponding PSA Grade
    (ie SGC 96 to PSA 9) and PSA felt that the card didn't merit the 9 holder.......

    They won't bust the card out of the holder and put it in an "8" holder - so they provide a M/G
    Steve Saldutti
    sjjs28@comcast.net
    Collector of 1964 Topps Stand Ups, 1965 Embossed, 1968 Topps Game and 1969 Topps Decals
    Registered Sets: 1964 Stand Ups, 1965 Embossed, 1968 Topps Game, 1969 Topps Decals
  • FBFB Posts: 1,684 ✭✭
    Aaaahhh... makes sense.

    Thanks Steve.
    Frank Bakka
    Sets - 1970, 1971 and 1972
    Always looking for 1972 O-PEE-CHEE Baseball in PSA 9 or 10!

    lynnfrank@earthlink.net
    outerbankyank on eBay!
  • The secret to a successful crossover is to "Buy the card, not the holder". A large percentage of the cards in other holders were put there by submitters looking to maximize the apparent grade and/or value of cards on the edge. A small percentage of the cards in other holders were put there because the submitter didn't know any better. They weren't aware that any one grading company was any better, and didn't know or care about the grade and/or value of the card. What does this mean? To one extreme you have PRO. It means that there are some perfectly fine cards in PRO holders out there. It also means you have to wade through a whole lot of garbage to find them. If you buy them from the "professional submitter" you will lose "money" crossover attempts 100% of the time. If you very carefully hand select cards from the "novice submitter", based on your abilities, you will be much more successful. To the other extreme you have cards in SGC, GAI, and BVG&S type of holders which are going to contain a much higher percentage of cards that you will do much better on when trying to cross them over. Again, it matters a great deal about who you are buying the cards from. Are you buying the cards from a guy who knows that the PD or OC won't fly with PSA, so the grades will be better elsewhere, or are you buying them from a guy who just likes one of the other companies better. They all look at things a little differently when grading. If you just go out and buy the first hundred SGC 88's and 92's that you can find on Ebay, and submit them for crossover, you will get hammered on the crossover attempt. If you select your 88's and 92's very carefully based on high quality scans or seeing the cards in person, and you are very good at knowing what PSA wants to see, then you will do very well. A lot of the cards are on the edge. The same would go if you were looking to crossover 88's to 92's. Pick the bad 88's, you get hammered. Pick the good 88's, you'll do well.
  • murcerfanmurcerfan Posts: 2,329 ✭✭
    invoice 4013369
    all well centered sgc 88's except one that was a nice sgc 92.
    Not a slider among them.
    Funny how the stars never seem good enough. The Kilmer I thought could go 9.
    The Karras is much nicer than the 8 they just sent back to me last month.
    I honestly have come to expect this kind of result and it is the main reason i am submitting fewer and fewer cards. SGC is grading so harshly I am reluctant to send anything over there either.

    These 8's do move my #1 set forward a couple hundredths of a point though
    image
  • ejguruejguru Posts: 617 ✭✭✭
    Steve: Thanks for reminding me that maybe "it is just me."image

    Murcerfan: Thanks for supporting the theory that "it isn't just me."image

    All good points WTTTTS. Totally agree. I usually try to use my good eye before crossovers, but couldn't prescreen many of these recent submits. Hopefully I can find a few SGC set builders (besides SRS) that can use these cards.

    EJ
    "...life is but a dream."

    Used to working on HOF SS Baseballs--Now just '67 Sox Stickers and anything Boston related.
  • seinbigdseinbigd Posts: 206 ✭✭
    Crossover Satisfaction!

    Sent 2 1962 Topps GAI-8s in on 05-01-03. Grades were posted today (05-22-03) which crossed over to PSA-8s just fine.

    Invoice #8034606.
Sign In or Register to comment.