I like my coins white!!!

I figured the title would capture a few fire breathers!!
Anyway, I don't buy into the monster toning fad. Yes, I believe that they are interesting and in some cases attractive. But, my reasoning is that the coins were manufactured to have a particular look; I want mine to appear as close as possible to that original state.
Let the flaming begin!!
Anyway, I don't buy into the monster toning fad. Yes, I believe that they are interesting and in some cases attractive. But, my reasoning is that the coins were manufactured to have a particular look; I want mine to appear as close as possible to that original state.
Let the flaming begin!!
Wondo
0
Comments
Tom
Russ, NCNE
Russ, NCNE
Russ, NCNE
Russ, NCNE
for those of you who like blast white, hey, thats fine. Just don't assume all monster toned coines were AT to look that way. I would agree that some prices being paid for common coins with the right monster color is going off the charts.
besides, "white" large cents would look ridiculous.
K S
I can see the "Albino cent" on ebay.
about the time the first unc was made and some collectors have always
preferred them. While there aren't large numbers I'd pay a large premium
for, it is obvious why they sometimes bring substantial premiums. These are
often strikingly beautiful coins. Since eye appeal is part of grading, it stands
to reason that attractivce toning might make a piece an easier sell.
Toning does fade in and out of favor, but it is not at an apex currently.
I do have a slight issue with your stated reasoning, however:
<< <i>But, my reasoning is that the coins were manufactured to have a particular look; I want mine to appear as close as possible to that original state >>
Most of these coins were minted with the "intent" that they be spent and heavily circulated. So, why not collect heavily circulated coins, if you really care about "intent"?
I like them both. Even with AT, if it looks good to me, then it can be in my album.
Good point. I would collect the heavily circulated ones, but Braddick has cornered the market for his registry set!!
Sorry, Pat.
No flaming from me. I've posted this in the past. I don't own a "monster toned" coin and I really doubt I ever will unless the AT boogie-man breaks into my house, cracks my safe and does his nefarious deeds on the few I have. Anaconda has a beautiful original 18.11 half that I'd love to have, but I have to wait until my wife isn't looking
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Good thread. I like most toned coins and buy both. But, I do think there should be a distinction made between "mint state" and "uncirculated" coins.
<< <i>Anyway, I don't buy into the monster toning fad. Yes, I believe that they are interesting and in some cases attractive. But, my reasoning is that the coins were manufactured to have a particular look; I want mine to appear as close as possible to that original state. >>
Well said. Sometimes it's nice to see what the coin looked like when it left the mint, and that is something we don't often see with Bust halves and such. I like a little color, but I also like untoned coins.
The recent "monster toning" craze is definitely a fad. This is not to suggest that all appreciation of toned coins falls into the fad category, however.
No fad. Collectors have been enjoying toned coins for a long time. The reality is coins tone, especially those that were minted and survived through a period of time when modern climate control didn't exist. Except for hoards of Morgan that saw storage under special circumstance most 19th century coins have some level of toning. That's just a part of the history, a history I appreciate especially when you end up with nice coloration like this:
(Unfortunately not my coin
I like my coins white too!
Have found that Sears Best Weatherbeater in Satin White seems to have the best long term adhesive properties when it comes to my silver coins. I do not recommend it on copper or gold.
Thanks.