Home U.S. Coin Forum

A highly unusual "guess the grade" AND designation(S): Updated with the grade/attribution

coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
Just for fun, here is a rare and unusual item (which we recently placed with a client) for your viewing pleasure and guesswork.

This one will be quite tricky, for at least a couple of reasons, which I will not divulge until later.
I will withhold comments and information about this piece until people have had time to reply.

Edited to add:

The area by the date, which appears to be discolored, is distorted by the image (perhaps due to glare or slight variation in the finish of the coin's surface) but it does not look like that in person.


image

Comments

  • tjkilliantjkillian Posts: 5,578 ✭✭✭
    MS-63 DC. Very few hits, lots of hair lines, fantastic cameo effect.

    Nice looking coin.

    Tom
    Tom

  • boiler78boiler78 Posts: 3,070 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Proof 63/64 cameo Wow! Thats a great coin. I'll bet that is a bit spendy!image
  • theboz11theboz11 Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭
  • ccrccr Posts: 2,446
    PR63. The Designation is - Cool Coin!image

    She`s one hot babe!
  • Dog97Dog97 Posts: 7,874 ✭✭✭
    It's tricky because Proof & MS were struck from the same die and it has alignment marks which look like contact marks around the words.
    Looks AU58 to me but this rarity could easily grade MS64DMPL or Prf 64 DCam but I really have no clue since I'm a Morgan man.
    Change that we can believe in is that change which is 90% silver.
  • BigEBigE Posts: 6,949 ✭✭✭
    NGC MS-65 PL, that's my guess so go ahead and laughimage----------------BigE
    I'm glad I am a Tree
  • K6AZK6AZ Posts: 9,295
    As usual, I am going along with Dog. Now I could be all wet, but I see dulling in the fields that usually denote wear. And like Dog, I am a Morgan guy so take my AU58 with a grain of salt.
  • HigashiyamaHigashiyama Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Uhh ... can I be a little rude and suggest it is an ANACS net graded coin, with obverse tooling? The hairlines just look too strong.
    Higashiyama
  • It looks like a really neat coin to me too!

    I appreciate the question. I know nothing about early quarter eagles so looked this date up. I learned that there are a handful of proofs known. So I will guess this is one of them. My grade guess is PR 63 Cameo.
  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    Excellent coin, beautiful! Gotta be proof. I'll say the picture is a PR64 CAM. Although I can see it DCAM. The edge looks too flat and the details too crisp for me to think mint state.

    Very berry beautiful
  • PR63

    Edit: This is tough becuase of the size of the scan...A grader would not see this coin with as much detail..

    Thus, It could be a PR 65

    Did they even make a proof in 1821?
  • UncleJoeUncleJoe Posts: 2,544 ✭✭✭
    If this is a proof, is it unique?

    But I'm leaning toward MS-PL if there is no rub.

    Regardless, a beautiful coin.

    Joe.
  • dragondragon Posts: 4,548 ✭✭
    I'll guess PR64 Cameo


    dragon
  • Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,275 ✭✭✭
    Since you say it's rare, I have to go with MS62 large denticles.
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • ms70ms70 Posts: 13,956 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I say MS61. Do I get to keep it if I win??????

    Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.

  • PR65 Cam image
    Glenn
  • relayerrelayer Posts: 10,570

    You've got to be kidding - how can I grade a coin from a scan? image

    I'll guess PR64CAM. Very nice coin.

    image
    My posts viewed image times
    since 8/1/6
  • coinlieutenantcoinlieutenant Posts: 9,317 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • MS65PL
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    This "Capped Head, Large Size" Quarter Eagle is an extremely rare, beautiful, and cool coin. It resides in an old NGC PR64 holder, an obvious cameo, which was certified before NGC and PCGS began using the "Cameo" designation.

    NGC and PCGS have each attributed three Proof examples (all 1821's) of this short lived type, which was issued only in 1821, 1824 (4 over1), 1825, 1826 (6 over 5) and 1827. I suspect that there is some duplication of the numbers represented in the Population/Census reports. Walter Breen speculated that these coins were struck in Proof to commemorate the new design for resumption of coinage of U.S. Quarter Eagles, 1808 having been the last year of the denomination until this new design appeared.

    As is often the case, the images do not adequately show the coin for what it is, so for those of you who guessed wrong, you were facing very long odds. And, for anyone who guessed right - maybe you got just a little bit lucky. image

    This piece has deep mirror surfaces on both sides, which in the images, unfortunately, merely look darker than other areas of the coin. The Cameo effect is gorgeous and the strike is superb - look at the detail on Liberty's hair/curls on the obverse and the eagle on the reverse. There are very few hairlines or other man-made impairments, though there is a small mint-made planchet defect at the jaw area, which is characteristic of other known proofs.

    People use the term "rare coin" rather loosely. THIS is a RARE coin! I have already received questions about what a coin like this sells for. It sold for between $150,000 and $200,000 this month.
  • Hey! Nice coin!image

    Too bad I couldn't guess!

  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    Mike, thanks for not guessingimage
  • mdwoodsmdwoods Posts: 5,549 ✭✭✭
    I'm gonna say PR64.image
    National Register Of Big Trees

    We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
  • Mark states in his answer that this is a "RARE" coin and that this type was made from 1821 to 1827.

    What he left out is that 1821 is the only date of the type that is known in Proof - that's how rare this really is!
  • coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    Mike, I did say:

    << <i>NGC and PCGS have each attributed three Proof examples (all 1821's) of this short lived type, which was issued only in 1821, 1824 (4 over1), 1825, 1826 (6 over 5) and 1827. >>

    I guess I could have made it clearer, but I did say it.image

    mdwoods - lucky guess. image
  • krankykranky Posts: 8,709 ✭✭✭
    That's a stunner. I also thought the obverse fields had some discoloration from wear (esp. in front of the face) but I couldn't see it on the devices. I would have guessed PR58CAM considering your caveat that it was "tricky".

    New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.

  • dragondragon Posts: 4,548 ✭✭
    I guess the grade spot on, including the designation, and then you tell us we're just lucky?? sheeeesh!


    dragon
  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    >As is often the case, the images do not adequately show the coin for what it is, so for those of you who guessed wrong, you were facing very long odds. And, for anyone who guessed right - maybe you got just a little bit lucky.

    ABSOLUTELY correct in my case. image
  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    outstanding coin! wouldn't happen to have the same thing in, say, an au55, would you Mark?

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • NicNic Posts: 3,390 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Neat coin and post. Thanks for the info.! K
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭
    ********************superb******************************************


    sincerely michael
  • SethChandlerSethChandler Posts: 1,718 ✭✭✭✭
    Great coin! Does it have a pedigree? What does your client focus on? Do they have any other monsters that you can share with the boards?

    Seth
    Collecting since 1976.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file