Registry weighting dilemma
Wondo
Posts: 2,916 ✭✭✭
I'm working on a type set, currently 40th or 50th depending which entry one looks at, and I am having trouble deciding whether to buy a 1793 chain cent vf25 or a 1964 Jeff proof 68. Does anybody know if one is weighted more than the other?. Obviously, this is a stupid rhetorical question (redundant). But how do the weighting work? I really am only interested in the early stuff but my ego has propelled me to buy some moderns , whose collector base is wonderful and vibrant - no bashing. Collect what y'all want - I did baseball cards for 25 years! But it seems I have succumbed to PCGS registryitis. Help!!!
Wondo
0
Comments
Personally, I'd buy the chain cent each and every time over a '64 Kennedy. That's not to say that '64 Kennedys in proof are a dime a dozen in 68, but you'll see tons more of them than a Chain Cent in VF.
You were very kind in your post when I know you were thinking - "What an idiot!" I am just relating how a rational collector of certain type of coins has tempted to buy stuff that he has no interest in - marketing 101 or maybe 201. I bought the Chain, but isn't that weird that those thoughts went through my head?
By the way, I am buying Moderns, and letting my daughter work on the type collection and getting the enjoyment/education from it.
Now MY Chain Cent has character, and tells a story when you look at it. Now granted,
it is PCGS Poor 01, (so it would not be the appropriate coin for you if you are worried
about your weighting!) but it is a great conversation starter!
Rob
Tough call
My posts viewed times
since 8/1/6
In an unweighted set, like it is now, filling holes has more effect on rank than anything else. So if you don't care about coins you can buy the cheapest coin to fill the holes. But I wouldn't buy a coin I don't care about.
Too bad there isn't a 18'Th Century type set for you. Then you could enjoy every coin.
I do enjoy every coin - I'm just a whiner!
In my book, anyone with a Chain Cent and a 1794 Dollar can whine all they want!!!