Options
Roosevelt Registry FB submissions . . .

I pulled the dimes I thought would make FB from my MS 1946-2002 registry sets and sent them in. 46 coins, including several "maybe's." Also sent in 13 extras which might make it. I'll post results when I get them.
Anybody else sent theirs in yet?
Anybody else sent theirs in yet?
Doug
0
Comments
If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!
So far I sent 1 in Yesterday, I'm not as optimistic as you guys .
Glen
I would like to do something with you Registry Set collectors. I say we collect the data on FB's before PCGS put them up, so we can know what to work on for the next several months.
Anybody game for this???
White Fang...you should have more then just 46 dimes, come on, your collections are out of sight!
Just helpin with that ego
Paul B. Gunsallus
Later, Paul.
remember right about 20 are already on the pop report.
I'll have to check the report! Thanks.
If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!
Your idea that we all can benefit from sharing is a good one.
Nick and I have shared some data already about raw/slabs FB's.
I have made a bunch of new purchases in the last couple of weeks and have to update alot, when I'm done should I post it for all?
As far as grading of FB goes.
If they (grader) are any thing like they are with FS nickels, then some people are going to be disappointed. They (grader) will not be braking out the 15X to see if the bands are split. If it can not be seen with a 5X then it will not be FB.
The Pop Report
A very good place to start and should get better later, but for now you can't put to much stock in it. Once we have several months of data then we will see a ratio form as to number submitted to the number of FB.
Glen
PCGS received my coins on the 10th. I am wondering if it will only take 10 days for the review as David Hall said in another post. Out of the 7 coins only 2 are in my type set, so I hope to possibly post the others on the BS&T board after they get back. Also I'm not sure if anyone else has coins a head of mine but I was going to try and post a picture of my 1973-D which I think may not make the "FB" but close.
Ken
Edited to say: Sorry I mis quoted and it was not Mr. Hall. It was actually BJ's post to a question on current designation review que time in days.
My Washington Type B/C Set
1996-W MS68FB
1996-W MS66FB
If anyone is interested in either of these, please PM me with an offer. Otherwise, I am putting the MS68FB on eBay.
Bob
Vietnam Vet 1968-1969
PCGS committed to 10 days for the designation review and that's what is expected. If anyone's submission goes past 10 business days, please email me and I will push it.
bsearls@collectors.com
Set Registry & Special Projects Director
PCGS (coins) www.pcgs.com
PSA (cards & tickets) www.psacard.com
09/07/2006
I am glad to hear that commitmemt restated as I have three separate shipments totaling over 60 coins.
Casabrown
I did not scan it before I sent it in, but will post it when it comes back. Also I checked the status on my invoice and nothing yet. Then I was just checking my type set and noticed my 1948-S shows MS67FB now
BTW the 1948-S MS67FB shows as pop 2/0 wow! Not a tough date, but low pop for now.
BJ,
Thanks for jumping in. I had no doubt.
Ken
My Washington Type B/C Set
They havn't graded my clad set as of yet.
Paul B. Gunsallus
Later, Paul.
1948-S MS67FB
1996-W MS67 no go
1999-D MS68 no go
1973-D MS66 no go
1984-P MS66 no go
1999-P MS67FB
1999-D MS67FB
I guess that the one I'm really shocked about is the MS68. I guess it is not a sure thing that a MS68 is a full strike
Ken
My Washington Type B/C Set
If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!
did you cross out the submission number on two of the forms and write in the submission number you were using?
Mansco
If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!
Just for the record, I sent in 74 dimes and put them all on 1 submission form. I just printed the entire first form with the invoice # and then went to a second form. When I was done loading my next 20 dimes, I just printed that section of the second form and put it with the first an so on...
Good luck everyone, Paul.
Later, Paul.
Received my coins back yesterday. About the 1999-D MS68, it was my blind faith and naked eye that got caused me to assume this was a shoe in for "FB" The lower band had a couple contact marks crossing the split and is accurately graded as non "FB" that were clearly visible with a 5x loop.
I wanted to share one more thing, I felt of importance and a pay to see what they say test. Two reverse pictures of a 1984-P MS66. The first one looks as if it could have a lower "FB" and I looked at this one before I sent it in with a loop. The second closeup picture shows some flatness on the right hand side, where it should be rounded as the Merc's. Even though the lite split goes around to the right
(which is hard to tell by these pictures). The band must be more rounded, which I must say will knock out many Roosies from "FB". Take a look at the pictures for reference and add your comments as well as anything I may have missed.
1984-P MS66 rev 1
1984-P MS66 rev 2
Ken
My Washington Type B/C Set
you can see that your 84 is not FB, there is (like you said ) no band on the right side just slanted flat spot.
You will find that this area will bring 95% of the hopefull FB down.
I have been checking clad Roosie's for months and have every little that will pass the FB test.
Although 81 - 84 are not to hard to get with FBs, you do have to be able to see the FBs only using 5X.
I do not have the equipment to take close pcitures or I would show you some of mine.
I have a nice little pop report on these clads if you have an interest in them.
Glen
BTW, Anacs just started giving the FB designation to. I guess everyone jumped on the band wagon.
<< <i>
I have a nice little pop report on these clads if you have an interest in them.
Glen >>
I'd love to see it also.
Please do send me a copy of your report. The 1948-S MS67 "FB" which I sent in at the same time, is for now only a pop "2"
Ken
My Washington Type B/C Set