Opinions Sought On This PF67 Jefferson

WWW

I know a guy, who knows a guy that says this coin is tied for the finest known with 70 others.

FC57Coins

bet the other 69 don't look like this! Gorgeous!

Frank

Russ

Damn! If that thing is tied, tell me where the other 69 are!

Russ, NCNE

coinrookie

I think the pop number is about 10 higher. I like the colors. I especially like the reverse because the toning seems to be a little less spotty on the devices.

Gilbert

Happy Easter!

It is gorgeous, though, I don't understand how it got that way.

jonesy

That is one beautiful coin. Thanks for sharing!!
Glenn

BNE

What a PQ example! I bet at least sixty of those owners are willing to work out a trade -- after all, what's the difference? A simply gorgeous coin, and I don't mind the deposits.

coinguy1

WWW,

I wholeheartedly agree that the coin is gorgeously toned. But, in the future, if you are truly seeking unbiased opinions, why not leave the "gorgeously toned" part out of your question. In this case it probably wont make any difference in the replies you will receive, but, you did "lead the witness, your honor".

Tassa

I would've commented earlier, but I just couldn't stop looking at it.
Those are awesome colors. What causes that kind of toning?

RGL

As the scan unfolded -- before it hit the date -- I was expecting a 1960s Jeff. To see it is 1940, that makes it very special. Gorgeous.

CarlWohlforth

That one looks nice!

I have one of the ties. Mine is almost cameo. It is a different thing, but also desirable. I think I need two sets, one cameo and one toned!!!!!!

RGL

Carl ... Jump on in ... I am doing BNE one better -- in addition to a DCAM/CAM set and Brilliant set, I have started a third proof Jeff Registry set of wildly toned coins ... (Ya gonna take that lying down, Barry?)