Found a cool Brockage error in change.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6c7c/e6c7ce4f2cc670bbee94ab27c2c77f14782e0968" alt="oldcameoproofsguy"
This 1997-P dime shows a Brockage of another dime that was flipped around 180 degrees and not ejected from the dies. This coin looks to have been double struck, once normally then once with a previously struck dime leaving the Brockage. A mirror image of the remains of the "RTY" in LIBERTY can be seen in the fields in front of Roosevelts chin. A mirror image of Roosevelt's hair can be seen smashing part of the date.
The cool thing is that I never would have known what I was looking at if it hadn't been for education I have received from these forums.
The cool thing is that I never would have known what I was looking at if it hadn't been for education I have received from these forums.
0
Comments
I second the "but for learning on this forum" statement!
However, I really wish that I was not the one to break this news to you... I don't think it will make FT or FB
It was made by the same basic process but by squeezing 2 coins together in a vice or by similiar means rather than between 2 dies at the Mint, which would cause spreading of the planchet and possible splitting from the high pressure of the strike.
I'll bet your right.
I guess that would explain the smashed looking reverse.
Oh well, It looks like I got all worked up over nothing. It's kind of dumb to try and make one of these. I figured even if it was a genuine mint error, it was probably worth only its weight in copper at best. A more pronounced Brock would be worth considerably more I imagine.