Please let me know what you think of this Ebayer....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66f2e/66f2eac8667a7d7ccd6e47c1ede6d23f4110d61f" alt="IndianHeadMan"
He emailed this to me upon getting my payment.
"After you receive your package and have had a chance to examine the map please post feedback so I will know you are satisfied with your purchase and I will do the same.
Thanks for bidding and God Bless!"
"After you receive your package and have had a chance to examine the map please post feedback so I will know you are satisfied with your purchase and I will do the same.
Thanks for bidding and God Bless!"
0
Comments
I'm not fond of the practice, but I sure understand why they feel the need to take such a stand.
I'm confused what you're worrying about.....
i wouldn't leave any feedback.
2 Cam-Slams!
1 Russ POTD!
Again, am I missing something here? Seems fine to me....what is the seller a mobster or something?
this is just a nice way of saying "don't leave negative feedback or i'll retaliate".
2 Cam-Slams!
1 Russ POTD!
Hi,
I got the coin and I'm pleased with it. If you left feedback for me, I will reciprocate.
At that point, most sellers do leave feedback, and I do reciprocate. Only once, out of several hundred transaction has a seller responded that they only post feedback after the buyer. So, I didn't leave any (I was tempted to neg or neutral him for "holding feedback hostage," but I knew what that would get me...) About 10% of the sellers don't leave feedback, so I don't either.
At this point, with a 400 or so feedback, I really don't care if I get any more.
Baccaruda is correct.
Once the seller has received a valid payment, the buyer's task is done and deserves feedback.
Once the buyer has received a statisfactory item, the seller's task is done and deserves feedback.
Look at the problem from the other side, if it is ok for the seller to in effect say (you post feedback on me and then I'll do the same), then it would be just as valid for the buyer to say the same thing. So who goes first?
Unless eBay changes things such that NO feedback is displayed until BOTH have posted (i.e. in effect, they post feedback at the same time), then the only valid rule on who should post feedback when is that the Seller post feedback on receipt of payment and Buyer post feedback on receipt of item.
If sellers want the "right" to post feedback last, then they should receive their peice last (i.e. ship the item first, buyer gets item, posts feedback, then sends seller money, seller gets money, then posts feedback).
I don't believe in the feedback hostage situation. I leave feedback as a buyer when I receive my item. Some times the seller has already left feedback, sometimes they leave it right after me and sometimes they do not leave it at all. No biggie, I am on ebay to buy (and sell things) not get feedback.
As a seller, I used to leave feedback right away, but now I wait until I am sure the sale is a done deal. If a buyer leaves feedback, I will return it as I know they are happy with the deal. If they do not leave feedback, after a period of time I will leave it as I figure they must have received it and have not complained. I did have a buyer send me an email wanting feedback. I left it, but should not have as I cannot stand people who insist on feedback. It was a feedback hostage situation in reverse.
I always read mails with return feedback is always left.
I like the idea of feedback not posting until it is left by both parties. Of course, those with many negatives could just not leave feedback, and then none of them would show. This would force those who do not leave feedback (many who brag about their own feedback) to have to leave it in return.
If IndianHead does like the item, he leaves his positive feedback and I assume the seller will reciprocate....
Either way, you have positive feedback for both parties, regardless of whether IndianHead likes the item.
The only way this isn't true is if the seller refuses return, in which case he might have to deal with some negative feedback.
I still don't agree that the seller is using poor tactics to make sure he gets only positive feedback. I think that's an assumption.
HERE'S AN IDEA: IndianHead, why not call the seller and clear things up over the phone if you're that worried about it....?
Gotta love them Mercs
As a side note, I'd never send a request for feedback, in order for the buyer to expect my return feedback.
LSCC#1864
Ebay Stuff
I happen to post feedback when I get paid...thru Paypal. Twowood
What the seller means is "please post positive feedback" Does it really have to be said that a satisfied customer would normally post positive feedback?
If I was the buyer,I'd email the seller telling him how satisfied I am with the purchase and then I'd wait for him to post feedback for me before I post feedback for him.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
In short, a seller should not withold positive feedback, nor even present the appearance of witholding feedback for any inappropriate purpose.
Jim
This is always a tough one. Like many, I always leave postive feedback on satisfactory payment (as a seller) and on satisfaction of the sale (as a buyer), and never ask for feedback. All my feedback comes from those that really wanted to give it - so I feel good about all that is given.
That said, I don't mind it when someone asks for feedback in advance (either buyer or seller). Although I am a thin-skinned in general, I am thick-skinned when it comes to whether a seller holds back feedback on me until I've left feedback. If it was a good transaction, I answer it as such. If it was a hassle or wasn't good, then I work with the other party to resolution, and barring that, keep my feedback in reserve for the 90 days "just in case."
Just my way of doing things. It doesn't work for everyone...