SUPERB Results On My ERROR Coins.........
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5db0/b5db052070d8ac5ca46b119df3a8b0a70b1d115a" alt="Rampage"
.........the grades, denoms, and descriptions are below........
1995 Lincoln, MS66RED, DDO FS-040 Die 1
1995 Lincoln, MS66RED, DDO FS-040 Die 1
2000 Lincoln, Off Centered Die Cap, Too thick to put in a holder.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fdc8/1fdc8facbe3f8952b82b77b46b0e9c2da814d553" alt="image"
2000 Lincoln, MS64RED, Off centered partial brockage
2000 Lincoln, MS63RED, Broadstruck Ty 2 Rev Proof Hub
2000 Lincoln, MS63RED, Broadstruck Ty 2 Rev Proof Hub
1998 Lincoln, MS64RED, Broadstruck Ty 2 Rev Proof Hub
1999 Lincoln, MS66RED, Flipover double struck with partial collar.
2000 Lincoln, MS64RED, Double struck with indent (this has a torn planchet)
2001 New York Quarter, UNC Det, net AU50, Double struck 2nd strike 50% off center
1999 Lincoln, MS65RED, Triple struck on center, partial collar and also an Indent.
2000, MS63RED, Reverse Die Cap
1999, MS65RED, Flipover Double struck on center with partial collar.
1999, MS66RED, Flipover Double struck on center with partial collar.
1999, MS66RED, Double struck in Collar.
Overall, I am quite happy with these results. The only thing I am not happy with was the one not holdered because it was too thick.
Oh well, still a nice coin, just cannot keep it in my presentation case. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b78b/9b78bf6584c432c3873806130ed45f79f9dd33da" alt="image"
Richard.
1995 Lincoln, MS66RED, DDO FS-040 Die 1
1995 Lincoln, MS66RED, DDO FS-040 Die 1
2000 Lincoln, Off Centered Die Cap, Too thick to put in a holder.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fdc8/1fdc8facbe3f8952b82b77b46b0e9c2da814d553" alt="image"
2000 Lincoln, MS64RED, Off centered partial brockage
2000 Lincoln, MS63RED, Broadstruck Ty 2 Rev Proof Hub
2000 Lincoln, MS63RED, Broadstruck Ty 2 Rev Proof Hub
1998 Lincoln, MS64RED, Broadstruck Ty 2 Rev Proof Hub
1999 Lincoln, MS66RED, Flipover double struck with partial collar.
2000 Lincoln, MS64RED, Double struck with indent (this has a torn planchet)
2001 New York Quarter, UNC Det, net AU50, Double struck 2nd strike 50% off center
1999 Lincoln, MS65RED, Triple struck on center, partial collar and also an Indent.
2000, MS63RED, Reverse Die Cap
1999, MS65RED, Flipover Double struck on center with partial collar.
1999, MS66RED, Flipover Double struck on center with partial collar.
1999, MS66RED, Double struck in Collar.
Overall, I am quite happy with these results. The only thing I am not happy with was the one not holdered because it was too thick.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fdc8/1fdc8facbe3f8952b82b77b46b0e9c2da814d553" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b78b/9b78bf6584c432c3873806130ed45f79f9dd33da" alt="image"
Richard.
0
Comments
(Nice submission. I don't know why- but Error Coins always look better in PCGS plastic.)
peacockcoins
<< <i>Next time include a little stick-em note instructing PCGS to get a hammer and pound the cent down to a size that'll then fit.
ha ha ha.......I have one that is cupped just as much as this one and it seemed to make it in one okay. Though, it did look like a tight squeeze.
Looking for PCGS AU58 Washington's, 32-63.
So, that is how I got all of what I have. I have been slowly but surly getting all the good ones slabbed.
Most of what was in the bags were broadstrikes. I think out of two bags I found a total of 34 on center double strikes.
I sold nearly 5,000 of these broadstrikes on eBay a couple of years ago. Sold them between 10 to 40 cents each on average. I still have 2,000 or so. When ever I sell on eBay now, I try to add a few broadstrikes to get the buyers interested in mint errors. Many times I forgot to do it though.
The New York double strike I got on eBay in a lot of so-called damaged errors. The picture was really small compared to what the seller usually did. I have a 21 inch monitor and was able to blow the picture up so I knew what it was. Other errors in that lot was a die trial piece, a double strike dime, and a neat double stike cent.
That's really interesting and congratulations on the grades! I assume they were from PCGS?
I asked a question on the forum a few months ago, but never got any answer: Will PCGS attribute the error coin using the Wexler system? It appears your first two have that on the holder? I've got a proof Jeff that I'd like to send in, but only if PCGS uses the Wexler error attribute.
Bob
Vietnam Vet 1968-1969
May not be a bad idea to ask David Hall. They might, but I do not know.
I got one that PCGS calls deep but as you can see it could go a bit deeper.
Vietnam Vet 1968-1969