proof 2003-d lincoln?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2117b/2117b8a49e29b97eb0433e9ead6963c153387134" alt="rd5425"
I was looking through several unopened roles of 2003-d lincoln and I came across what seems to be a 2003-d lincoln struck on a proof planchet. It stuck out like a sore thumb when it was mixed in with the other business strikes. The coin was definitely struck on a proof planchet or the best business strike that exists. Is it even possible for this type of error to occur, especially when proofs are made at san fransisco, Im gonna send it into pcgs soon. If this was legitimate, what type of money would you expect this to bring in?
0
Comments
Of course, it takes more than a special planchet to make a proof. Maybe just seems like that and it's just a plain old ms69rd business strike. The output of Lincolns from the Denver mint, in particular, over the past couple of years has really been outstanding.
For some life lasts a short while, but the memories it holds last forever.
-Laura Swenson
In memory of BL, SM, and KG. 16 and forever young, rest in peace.
Send me the coin and I will pay you more than Gerry !!!!
Stewart
Second possibility would be if the firm supplying the cent planchets to the Denver mint is also supplying proof planchets to San Francisco. That might allow for a proof planchet to accidently get mixed in with the wrong batch.
I could be wrong - maybe you found a MS70 and you have never seen one before (well neither have I)
For some life lasts a short while, but the memories it holds last forever.
-Laura Swenson
In memory of BL, SM, and KG. 16 and forever young, rest in peace.
denominations it is likely that the planchet was "inadvertantly" polished rather
than being a proof planchet. When a good quality planchet gets a good strike
from a new die it will appear PL.
If it were merely new dies then there would be a very high probability of other
similar examples in the same roll.
Jeremy