Comments on this toned Morgan?

K6AZ

What do you all think of this one? I would really like to hear from the others who collect toned Morgans. This photo is extremely accurate as far as the color reproduction and the depth of the toning.

stman

AT job gone bad? Just kidding. Please don't take offense here but I would call it "not so pretty."

gemtone65

The monotone russet color, although somewhat unusual, is not especially pleasing. I would guess the coin should sell for a small premium over a white coin of the same quality. It seems to be NT, and that verdict would be strengthened if the reverse is mostly white with just a touch of toning at the borders.

Dog97

An interestomg looking coin. I kinda like it a little.

MrKelso

I don't like it. Please don't take offense but i am not sold on this whole tonning thing> i like my Morgans Blast white. I do like the date. My favorite.

TONEDDOLLARS

It looks just like a coin in my collection. It has screaming luster and resides in a 66 holder. Although some may not like the color in the scan in person I bet it it looks pretty nice. Mine also has proof like surfaces under the toning, maybe this one does also. TD

nwcs

I like it. Looks like envelope toning to me. Definitely not AT.

K6AZ

Toneddollars- it is not prooflike under the toning unfortunately. But the luster does scream out from under the toning, and that is one thing you can't see in the image. Here is another image at a slightly different angle, including the reverse:

coinkat

The toning appears to be okay. I like the coin, but please consider posting a piicture of the reverse so we get a look at the complete coin.

Dog97

79-S was a good year & mint. Most of them look like this. Look at the hair over the ear.

Bear

I like the color and the luster under it. IMO, I bet this coin looks much better in the hand

then even in the picture. Seems natural toning to me. Nice coin.