Is this coin AT or not???

MadMarty · March 10, 2003 12:06AM

DanC · March 10, 2003 12:07AM

Looks natural to my newbie eye.

nwcs · March 10, 2003 12:07AM

AT. The X's are painted over a white square painted within a beveled blue-grey square painted on a brower window painted on a screen painted on a larger coordinate system that GDI manages in the background for us.

nwcs · March 10, 2003 12:08AM

Ahh, now that there are pics... Looks encrusted to me. But the toning doesn't look good.

MadMarty · March 10, 2003 12:10AM

Should I say AT or Flame Broiled!

DanC · March 10, 2003 12:11AM

Ahhh... scorch marks on the obverse?

sinin1 · March 10, 2003 12:13AM

Some mint cellophane packs occassionally have coins that look similar to that -

but does it matter? It is very low on my list of Franklins for eye appeal (okay I think it is ugly)

MacCoin · March 10, 2003 12:14AM

marty is that a pototo coin or something crazy like that?

Steve27 · March 10, 2003 12:28AM

Is that the coin you flame broiled on that other thread?

CLASSICS · March 10, 2003 12:30AM

it does not look original or natural to me. i would pass.

bulloncoins · March 10, 2003 1:05AM

I see no luster where I would expect to see it. In my novice opinion ....AT. Maybe fell into a charcoal grill?

paigowjohnny · March 10, 2003 1:06AM

Burn it some more

MadMonk · March 10, 2003 1:09AM

Bic Lighter Toning, very rare.!.!

ElmerFusterpuck · March 10, 2003 1:32AM

More like AU - Awful Ugly!

Monstavet · March 10, 2003 2:10AM

Have mercy on us! My eyes! MY EYES!!!!!

That is one UGLY coin. Who cares what kind of toning it is.

It looks like it had hot MAG-MA (a la Dr. Evil) poured on it!

Is this coin AT or not???

Comments

Leave a Comment