Here’s an 1886 PCGS PR65 Cameo Three Cent Nickel...

I bought this one a while ago for just under $500. It’s a proof only issue with a mintage of 4,290. There are a couple of what look like carbon spots on the portrait, which I think is what’s limiting the grade to 65. It also looks like a nice cameo, as opposed to a borderline one. There are 5 graded by PCGS as cameo, with 20 higher.
In your opinion, would it be worth upgrading to a PR67 (not necessarily of the same year), since PR67's are quite reasonable ($1200 - $1400), or would you be happy with a PR65?
Dan
1886 3CN Obverse
1886 3CN Reverse
In your opinion, would it be worth upgrading to a PR67 (not necessarily of the same year), since PR67's are quite reasonable ($1200 - $1400), or would you be happy with a PR65?
Dan
1886 3CN Obverse
1886 3CN Reverse
0
Comments
I love the coin just the way it is.
Brian.
I agree, it's a pretty nice coin as a 65. For the price, I think 65's are a good value in this series.
Dan
mcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu">dmcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu
Enjoy it and don't sweat it...
NO slabbed coins!? Do you ever buy slabbed coins and then crack them open? I would think that it would be difficult to stay away from slabbs completely.
Dan
mcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu">dmcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu
I think the three cent nickel series is greatly undervalued and underated. The later dates in particular.
The Greco-Roman design is excellent. I think small coins tend to get overlooked alot. This is also the
case with Roosevelt dimes. I am currently having alot of fun with both series. I started the three cent
nickels last year by concentrating on common dates like the 1865 and 66 and then going to the later dates. Have fun with the series and keep us updated.
Brian.
Yes, be happy with that PR65CAM.
As wingedliberty said, though, it is an undervalued series. If you can find a nice CAM in PR 67 in the series, it's still worth the money. CAMs in that series are striking-looking! There remain some in the price range you cited for 1880-89, particularly 1881 and 1882.
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
since the three cent nicks are 85% copper they usually have toning dots on the face common as such but if not too large or distracting that is okie such is the way it is with these coins from the middle to latter part of the 19 th century! adds charactor and authenticity to these coins and this is the way they come
but they still look better than many modern era coins!
i think it has a fundemential reason to rise in value and is currently undervalued and a sleeper series
here is a scan of an ultra cameo 1871 ngc pf65
sincerely michael
<< <i>NO slabbed coins!? Do you ever buy slabbed coins and then crack them open? I would think that it would be difficult to stay away from slabbs completely. >>
Not hard at all, walk up to dealers case and look down. See any coins that aren't in slabs? If yes, examine them to so if you can use them. If no, move on to the next case. Works for me. None of my coin collection is slabbed, and I won't even look at slabbed coins when I am looking for coins for my collection.
"None of my coin collection is slabbed......slab collector and researcher"
so, technically, none of the slabs in your collection have coins in them? or do you not consider the coins in your slabs to be in your "coin collection" because they are in your "slab collection"
just curious
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry