Platinum American Eagle Opinions Wanted From Registry Participants
Typetone
Posts: 1,621 ✭✭
I have always liked the design of the platinum American Eagles, and I would like to collect a PCGS certified set in one of the denominations. In your opinion, is this a good time to buy them, or is the price of platinum too high right now? From an investment standpoint do you recomend proof or mint state pieces? Do you recommend a particular denomination? Do you recommend a particular grade? Anyone want to sell any?
BTW why are they called platinum eagles? Wouldn't platinum Statue of Libertys be better?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Greg
BTW why are they called platinum eagles? Wouldn't platinum Statue of Libertys be better?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Greg
0
Comments
Todd
800.954.0270
Didn't the mint state pieces also have different reverses?
Greg
There is a different reverse on the proof Plat Eagles for every year so far. The first year MS and PR both had the same reverse. The MS coins maintained this reverse but there is a different landscape with eagle reverse on the proofs for the last five years. This last year, 2002, was supposedly the last year of the "landscape" reverses, so the mint says.
Larry
Dabigkahuna
Greg
Their biggest problem as an "investment" I think is their expense, and the fact that there are four denominations. That turns off a lot of people who would otherwise be collectors. The demand is a fraction of the Silver Eagles, for example.
I'm hopeful that if the Vistas of Liberty (changing reverses) series really ends as scheduled that demand will pick up for the earlier coins. There's also been talk of discontinuing the Platinum Eagles altogether, but I don't know how serious that is.
There are some low mintages for the MS coins, but the mintages tend to be even lower for the proof issues. Like the proofs, none of the MS coins actually circulate, so it isn't a deal like non-bullion coins, that quality MS pieces are rarer than lower-mintage proofs because so many had been lost of circulation.
Also, all the MS coins look exactly alike, from year to year, and from denomination to denomination. Boring. All you're really talking about there for value is condition rariety (like the 1998 MS69 $10).
As people have said, though, the "Vista" series on the reverse of the proofs is fantastic. The best things that mint has done for many years, IMO.
Just look at the 1998:
the 1999:
and the 2000:
for example!
I think over time these beauties will be "discovered," and will be a point of much numismatic interest. The big problem is that they cost a lot, even for bullion value. But if I were going to put together a collection of platinums, the proofs are definitely the way to go.
There WERE rumors about plats being discontinued, but this apparently is not the case. The Mint is planning a new series of reverses for the proofs. I haven't heard yet what it will be, though.
Additional caveat: there's a precious metal hype on for now because of the impending war, and plats are more costly now. You might want to wait for when prices come back down. (Years later: "Why'd I listen to dpoole!! I coulda bought those things CHEAP in 2003!!").
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
Has the mint officially announced a new reverse series? I have mixed feelings about that, I was sorta hoping not to have to pour more money into them.
I'll even throw in the 2001:
...and what's wrong with the 2002??
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
Did I get it right?
Cheers
Greg
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
Greg, I'm not sure the $25 would be significantly affected by platinum prices, the premium may outweight the few dollars difference (I haven't checked). Regarding certified, that did not (in my experience) add much to the value, at least in the past. That may have changed with them being in the registry. Still, for long-term holding, personally I'd want to have the original packaging. It's nice packaging and nice original coins/packaging might bring a premium down the road.