how many people think bgs ia a scam?

i think there whole grading system is a scam. how can they be selling cards on there sight now? its a total conflict of interest. anyone else agree with me?
0
Comments
Here's proof that BGS doesn't grade cards accuratly, they basically just throw them in a slab without even looking at them.
1998 Leaf Rookies and Stars 199 Randy Moss BGS 8 (Error BGS Label 1999 Leaf Rookies and Stars 288 Kurt Warner)
2001 UD Graded Rookie Series Jerseys Graded 47 D.Brees NmMt+ BGS 8.5 (313/100)
2001 UD Graded Rookie Series Jerseys Graded 47 D.Brees NmMt+ BGS 8.5 (317/100)
2001 UD Graded Rookie Series Jerseys Graded 47 D.Brees Mint BGS 9 (326/100)
2001-02 Be A Player Ultimate Memorabilia Autographs 18 Jarome Iginla/40 BGS 9 (Error No Autograph)
According to Beckett the autograph is taken into consideration on the surface grade so for them to miss it tells me (and hopefully others) that they didn't even look at the surface.
Another big thing is they will not add those Brees errors to their list which I think is just wrong. It is a corrected error and should be added even if added without a price. I think the main reason it is not being added is because BGS screwed up.
My other biggest gripe is they print information that simply isnt true. They don't track prices on rare cards yet they still continue to list them. I must say it has gotten better with them not pricing too much under 25 but they have a way to go. I would rather see no price than a made up price.
Lets Go Buffalo!
Seth's Cards
Trading/Buying all high end BILLS GU/Autos! ! !
I think having a few good grading companies is a great idea, it keeps everyone on their toes and makes for better competition. If it wasn't for BGS, you would still have to buy a membership at PSA to grade cards.....still don't understand why you have to pay to see the pop report at PSA. I can understand paying for the Priceguide but not the pop report.
I was also referring to the 3 Brees cards with impossible serial numbers. They should be serail numbered of /500 but are serial numbered of /100
That doesn't make it a scam, it's a human error. Somebody just typed in the wrong number. I'm sure if you contact them and send it back it, they will put a new proper label for you.
Now, please read the following very carefully, as it is an important business and economic virtue:
EVERY manufacturer of a product or provider of a service dictates the value/cost of what their product is worth based on supply and demand of the market. We live in a capitalist society and I think economics should be a required class in high school, as it always amazes me the number of people who lose site of this when making arguments regarding card grading. Beckett grades cards and sells them at what people are willing to pay. PERIOD. They provide a guide that estimates relative values of cards, and that does influence the prices people may or may not pay, BUT it is still the market at work. When nobody wants to pay a price for a card, the value goes down. When everyone is buying the crap out of something (like Vick) the price goes up. That was Econ 101 when I went to college back in the day.
Additionally, a conflict of interest implies a fiduciary duty/obligation on behalf of one entity to another, like doctor-patient, attorney-client, etc. Beckett is a company and their selling their own product is hardly a conflict of interest. If it were, there would be a conflict of interest every time you go into the grocery store and see the generic "store" brand on the shelf that is cheaper than the name brand, or a million other scenarios were companies sell their own products/services.
And on one last issue, what do you expect from Beckett--100% perfection? Airplanes crash, tires blow out and oh by the way Beckett makes mistakes. Out of the millions of cards they grade you can point to some errors, where humans who conduct the grading fell asleep at the wheel. To me, it is much more egregious that PSA has given kickbacks to their high volume customers with more favorable grades and graded trimmed cards. These are INTENTIONAL and if you do not understand why that is more egregious than the mislabeling of cards or grading mistakes you need some clinical help.
Chuck
my Trade/Want list
Moron