I don't collect the 54 Topps but as a Cubs and Banks fan I have always loved this card. Can somebody tell me if they think this a low, middle or high end 8 from the scan. I think it is kind of close to the top??????? Thank you!!!!! 54 Banks
I don't like the t/b centering that much, personally....
I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
How did this card grade an 8 with that centering??
I'm here to question, not to inspire or build up. To live how I want, as I see fit, according to my values and my needs. Nothing holds dominion over me, I stand alone as the ruler of my life.
I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
To me it looks average. Banks is a really tough card to find centered and clean. I will give you my own personal rule for evaluating centering on 54's. I go to the bottom of the card and compare the left, right and bottom borders. If they are equal (or within my low tolerance) the card works for me. Some of the white jersey, white background cards get difficult though. This rule also works really well on 1963 cards if you look at the top of the card.
For what it's worth, Doug
Looking for well centered 1958 topps baseball psa 8 and up. Also dying for a 70 Aaron All Star in PSA 9.
I guess the ultimate question is : Do you think the card is High end enough for you to plunk down $XXX. In the end you are the one who has to be happy with the card....
Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass... it's about learning to dance in the rain.
I know the centering on this issue is all over the board and very tough, but for this card to have an 8 is entirely inexcusable. Read the centering standards written by PSA and it is a shoe-in for a PSA refund of some sort. No way that's a straight 8 - period.
<< <i>I know the centering on this issue is all over the board and very tough, but for this card to have an 8 is entirely inexcusable. Read the centering standards written by PSA and it is a shoe-in for a PSA refund of some sort. No way that's a straight 8 - period. >>
I agree that a problematic issue should not be given a looser standard just because it is frequently oc. Just like certain cards within a set are tough to find centered and, therefore, low population, if the '54s are normally oc then the populations for high grade cards from that year should be correspondingly lower.
Comments
according to my values and my needs. Nothing holds dominion over me, I stand alone as the ruler of my life.
CU turns its lonely eyes to you
What's the you say, Mrs Robinson
Vargha bucks have left and gone away?
hey hey hey
hey hey hey
T/B looks about the same.
GAI Banks
Just about every 54 Banks I can find is a little "top" heavy.
Here
For what it's worth,
Doug
<< <i>I know the centering on this issue is all over the board and very tough, but for this card to have an 8 is entirely inexcusable. Read the centering standards written by PSA and it is a shoe-in for a PSA refund of some sort. No way that's a straight 8 - period. >>
I agree that a problematic issue should not be given a looser standard just because it is frequently oc. Just like certain cards within a set are tough to find centered and, therefore, low population, if the '54s are normally oc then the populations for high grade cards from that year should be correspondingly lower.