Grade this morgan.

clackamas

What do you think?

Placid

If it's in a slab maybe 66-67. If it's raw 65.

MastaHanky

Whoa.

Great strike, mark free, looks MS66 - 67ish...

BUT

It almost looks unnaturally smooth, almost as if the picture has been photochopped.

coppercoins

Hard to see the minor stuff in the image, but it looks like 67 all day.

hughesm1

From the image given, looks like a 65, maybe 66. BUT, this image is somewhat grainy and probably hiding minor scuffs and dings. Wouldn't pay more than 64 money for this one.

relayer

Since that's not the actual color of the coin it's hard to tell. 65-67 depending on the lighting.

Cam40

Let me guess.It was a crack-out MS65 and `NCSed` to a raw 67 (pre-submitted).

If the coin pretty much really looks like that shot its a 67 or 66 if the luster is nearly flat.

Sure looks good from the pic.

MacCoin

I like it 65+

oreville

Picture makes it look like a near 67 but it seems to be a 65 or a 66. Hard to be sure. I have a poor feel for the luster and or the reflection/brilliance of the coin as the lighting is at an extreme low angle from the west to northwest and is distorting the real look of the coin. This can hide imperfections and luster breaks.

jbsteven

there is something funny with that picture........

whizzed?

darktone

it's too hard to tell from the picture. It could be a whizzed coin or a nice high grade MS coin but from the pic I just don't know. mike

nwcs

The picture looks sharpened by Photoshop and cropped out from its holder/container. I'll give the image a 66.

benloe

Most the 81-Ps don't look like that. What's up?

LincolnCentMan

MS66 Details net XF40 polished... dont know, hard to tell from the pic.

David

clevegreg

Looks almost TOO good, if there is such a thing I get the feeling either that the image has been manipulated to look better, or that the coin has been polished. Some of the details in the hair look alot like coins that I have seen that have been polished.

If neither of these are true, then it is one heck of a Morgan!!!

Greg

Jamericon

6 or a 7? Picture looks funny. Cleaned, polished?

JeffinMich

If the picture accurately represents the coin, it looks like a solid 67 to me.......if the picture is manipulated it could be just about anywhere from BB to MS-67.

eagle7

The digital image has been taken at an other than 90 degree angle to the surface or something has caused too much reflection. As far as grade with such an inaccurate photo my best guess is MS64.

Steve27

The pic is a 67 the coin is probably something less.

nwcs

Here is my speculation on what the coin might look like color-corrected and enhanced a bit to show it a tad larger.

Neil

Gilbert

There is too much "suspect" about the image to even venture a guess. The Motto/legend, stars, arrows and wreath should not be more "brilliant" than the fields (I assume it is why they are black in the image); they just don't strike or wear that way and it doesn't appear to have the rims of a proof. I am dying to hear the grade and why.

Baley

from the photo it looks better than 64 maybe as high as 67, strike looks sharp but not needle, need the coin in hand to determine the luster, and whether the luster breaks at highpoints are light friction from other coins (piece is free of heavy baggies) or wear/rub/polished or what. nice piece from photo, would offer 64 money to a stranger and all sales final, 65 to a dealer I've dealt with who has a return priv., 66 money if it were in an N or P slab, and probably couldn't decide to afford it if it were truly a 67

paigowjohnny

Looks like rub on the breast...AU-58

clackamas

I don't know what the grade is. I saw this on Ebay and wanted to get input on the coins before I decided to bid.

Dog97

If nothing else is wrong with it there is a row of hits by the chin, on the cheek near the eye, a BIG hit on the eagle and the strike isn't the strongest in the world. MS64/65/

dorkkarl

polished, net-grade ms-60

K S