75 Schmidt PSA 9
EOMINT
Posts: 349 ✭
Had to pay almost a grand for it but boy I love this card, had been looking for it for a long time...always has centering and printing problems...as usual I had to fight tooth and nail w/ 55Bowman and RedSoxJeff to get it!
EOMINT
EOMINT
0
Comments
Congrats on getting an awesome card! Sure would have looked good in my collection :-)
Schmidt Basic Set
Are you registered on the set? Once again - Congrats
75 Schmidt - NICE Psa 9
aconte
EOMINT
Seriously, great card. I think that is about what Marc S paid for his awhile ago...
CU turns its lonely eyes to you
What's the you say, Mrs Robinson
Vargha bucks have left and gone away?
hey hey hey
hey hey hey
I certainly don't mean to minimize the card as it's very nice. You just don't see many 75 Schmidt's that clean.
Enjoy!
Mike
<< <i>DSL got a 9? Who'd of thunk it...
We are talking about a 1975 PSA 9...not a 1955 PSA 9...right?
John
RETRACTION....
I meant convey that sniping could of saved some dollars.
John
CU turns its lonely eyes to you
What's the you say, Mrs Robinson
Vargha bucks have left and gone away?
hey hey hey
hey hey hey
As mentioned before this 75 Schmidt PSA 9 closed for almost the exact same amount that 55bowman (marc) paid for his a few months back. The funny thing is i remember a few guys then questioning the price just as we have tonite.
wouldnt you want to protect your investment?
John
aconte
<< <i>We are talking about a 1975 PSA 9...not a 1955 PSA 9...right? >>
I was thinking a similar thought Basilone.
Who said the card market is dead anyway?
EOMINT -- Congratulations on such a great pickup! You should be quite proud to own such a card -- with a tremendously low population, the 1975 Topps Schmidt #70 PSA 9 MINT is absolutely his hardest regular issue card to obtain in high-grade. And, in fact, at least 60% of the available population of this card is presently accounted for in private collections. Hopefully it will be a treasure that you will appreciate for a long time!
Marc
<< <i>I resent the implication that I was bidding up the card merely to protect my investment >>
Marc-
Not sure how to respond but here it goes.
First of all...I am not sure where I spoke negatively of your Mike Schmidt collection. Your collection is one that all player collectors should look up to. I do not understand from my posts where you feel I said you were crazy for collecting high end MS cards. My favorite player is Willie Stargell....we went to games as kids in approx the same era....I know how you feel about your favorite player....I wish I had a tenth of the collection for Stargell that you have for Schmidt.
Secondly....I was just looking at the bid history of the item.
You placed the following bids.
55bowman(534) $666.00 Jan-24-03 13:36:55 PST
55bowman(534) $609.00 Jan-24-03 13:36:47 PST
55bowman(534) $577.00 Jan-24-03 13:36:34 PST
55bowman(534) $513.00 Jan-24-03 13:36:26 PST
55bowman(534) $444.00 Jan-24-03 09:35:05 PST
You mention that you would gladly pay $600-$750 a pop for the card...so I can see your reasoning on the bids above....IM NOT ACCUSING YOU OF RUNNING UP THE AUCITON WITH THESE BIDS.
But then you placed another bid:
55bowman(534) $987.00 Jan-26-03 19:44:25 PST
According to the dollar figures you presented in your last post this seems to exceed $600-$750.
I was merely responding to the post by Yzerman19 that you paid a similar amount (approx $1k) for the same card several months ago.
Furthermore, you have even posted yourself that in the past...you have attempted to corner the market on certain MS cards...so the idea that you MAY be protecting your investment and/or the value of rare Schmidt cards is not out of the realm of possiblities.
I apologize for the implication that the ONLY REASON you bid a very high top-all was to protect your investment...we all know you collect MS....I do not think anyone would blame a collector for protecting his or her collection (what does the board think?). I cannot say for certain that your purchase a few months earlier had anything to do bidding patterns on this card (as Im not in your head).
Once again...I was merely looking at the information presented in the bid history.
I apologize for any confusion.
John
Even if you were, Marc, who cares! The last thing you need to do is to explain and justify your bids in an auction.
I agree...I see nothing wrong with someone wanting to protect their investment. I do not know what the big deal is here.
John
I would agree that it's within tolerance. . .but when I send cards with centering like that, they almost always come back to me in 8 holders. At 97%+ complete, I do have some frame of reference on 75T 8s and 9s.
Mike
area cable sports channel (Comcast sports) that card has been shown (briefly at times) a
handful of times. It is a card that is very tough to find in mint condition.
My main points are this:
If I owned the card in Psa 9 I would bid the card up and see no problem doing so. It's not like
I would get hurt if I won the auction. That card is not found too often in mint grade. And like
MS states most are in private collections. I think a smart move is to bid up a card like this.
Second, if my red man purchases did not take up most of my monthly card spending $$$, I
would pay at least $1,000 if not close to $1,500 for that card. Right now I just can't do that.
Just wanted to explain my previous post!
aconte
BTW, if I feel compelled to measure a card's centering to see if it is within tolerance, that in itself is a good indication that I should pass on the card. With the Schmidt card, I would have no reservations whatsoever. It looks like a great card!
As always, everyone's experience is different. The fact that DSL has a reputation for occasionally selling marginal-for-grade examples would also give me pause on this auction.
Mike
Ron
Heck -- I can trace thirteen separate and unique Mike Schmidt PSA 10's (and that's just multiple issues -- not multiple copies of the same card in PSA 10) that I have purchased from them. Having thrown thousands of dollars their way for a wide variety of graded and ungraded cards over the past three years, I can tell you that they are surprisingly consistent, with a 99% satisfaction rate.
MS
Absolutely!!! That dealer has already gone through his cards and plucked out the mint cards to have them graded himself - especially if it had a shot at gemint. Of course you're going to have a better shot at 9's and 10's from unopened material than from dealer's tables.
Wayne
Link to Pro Grading
Wayne
<< <i> 90109257 -> 90109304 (48 cards) were all 1976 Palmers, and 6 of these got 10's, the rest were mostly 9's with a few token 8's. >>
i would love to know were they get their 76's. they just hit ebay with about 35 psa 9's of course pretty much all the ones i need.
ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
MS- is that 100% accurate?
Waittill - is MS correct?
Wayne - glad someone other than myself feels that way
John
Guys,
Well my comment is this and not to be taken serious but just to bulge your brain...
Where does dsl get the 70's product could it possibly be from CU...Hence ad from the
SMR two years ago looking for 70's unopened and have million cash to spend!!!!!!
Honestly do you think CU purchased all the product to sit on for ten years while the market
explodes with 10's...Do you think they are sitting on it wasting an oppurtunity or do they
see a pop of 25 psa 10's ten yrs down the road a investment...Any stockholder willing to
explain this!!!!!!!!
Just 2 cents!!!!
Matt
CU turns its lonely eyes to you
What's the you say, Mrs Robinson
Vargha bucks have left and gone away?
hey hey hey
hey hey hey
why would they send a card that looks like this to be graded is my question?. i wouldn't send that in if it was the last ungraded card on the planet.
ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
Link inactive, as for sending to bgs good point...But different cards different market...
Then your talking grading fee verse profit...BGS in newer cards profit more across the
board...
Matt
ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
Off the top of my head all of the above just depends how nice you want and willing to spend...
But as for being in 9 holder yes I've got extras except maybe the gossage...
Matt
wow i don't no why probably for the fact somebody will buy it...
As for the sitting on product -- part of me truly believes that some of David Hall's prize pieces were "purchased back", sat on for a few years, and then auctioned off in the past year or two after prices had skyrocketed. Just a theory of course -- but quite a few advanced collectors thought that that may apply to some of the vintage 10's that surfaced again for a second time last Spring.