Has Anyone Ever Seen This?
ChasMan
Posts: 26
I wanted to get some feedback on this. Yesterday, I opened a package of cards that I had won on auction. There were a dozen PSA 9 1970 Topps Baseball. When going through the cards to store in my collection, I noticed something very starnge with one of the cards (Gary Nolan).
It looked as if the card was in a soft sleeve, inside the PSA plastic holder. Yes, you heard right, a regular plastic sleeve. Upon closer examination, I could see that the outter perimeter of the plastic holder was the right specification; it stacked with all of the others. However, looking at the interior make-up, I could see that the four long plastic prongs that hold the card in place were off. They were wider/higher than usual in their location. In other words, if the card had been palced in there withoout the sleeve, then it would have moved around significantly, due to the extra space. The plastic sleeve made it fit almost perfect. Do not know why the edmbosser would not have caught this. It takes more effort to get a sleeve and put the card into it, than just getting a new plastic case, presumebly if they work in an assembly line format with multiple submissions.
Now, I am not a real big expert on PSA cards, having only been into graded material for a couple of years, but this is a first for me. Can I get some feedback from you guys that have submitted and/or purchased hundreds or even thousands of PSA graded items over the years?
TextText
It looked as if the card was in a soft sleeve, inside the PSA plastic holder. Yes, you heard right, a regular plastic sleeve. Upon closer examination, I could see that the outter perimeter of the plastic holder was the right specification; it stacked with all of the others. However, looking at the interior make-up, I could see that the four long plastic prongs that hold the card in place were off. They were wider/higher than usual in their location. In other words, if the card had been palced in there withoout the sleeve, then it would have moved around significantly, due to the extra space. The plastic sleeve made it fit almost perfect. Do not know why the edmbosser would not have caught this. It takes more effort to get a sleeve and put the card into it, than just getting a new plastic case, presumebly if they work in an assembly line format with multiple submissions.
Now, I am not a real big expert on PSA cards, having only been into graded material for a couple of years, but this is a first for me. Can I get some feedback from you guys that have submitted and/or purchased hundreds or even thousands of PSA graded items over the years?
TextText
Chuck
0
Comments
JEB.
it would not fit between the "bumpers" without damaging the card, so they went bigger and used the mylar sleeve that is common to most "tall boy" and undersized issues.
I want to also point out that the card does not appear to be shaved or smaller than an original. I measured it, and it is still the standard 2 1/2" x 3 1/2". The card is correct. It is the holder than is beyond standard.
I myself have received a few also actually I like the sleeve the cards don't move
around as much...
I agree with Murcerfan. In the set I collect, I have quite a few in the mylar sleeves. The cards are perfectly fine, but they were originally cut slightly bigger, and don't fit in the prescribed holder. For anal-retentive display purposes, these can be annoying as the cards tend to fall toward the bottom of the holder, and when stood up next to others in a regular holder, it gives a rollercoaster effect.
Bernie
Currently collecting.....your guess is as good as mine.
people agreeing with me: 1
If PSA ever decided to go to SGC style black mattes I would gladly reholder most of my cards.
Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's
CU turns its lonely eyes to you
What's the you say, Mrs Robinson
Vargha bucks have left and gone away?
hey hey hey
hey hey hey