Home U.S. Coin Forum

Is this 1942/1 Mercury cleaned?

clw54clw54 Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭
The surface just doesn't look very appealing to me, but I don't know if it's from an old cleaning. What do you all think?

Link

Comments

  • clw what I'm seeing is a pixel spread.He enlarged the picture to much and I'm seeing distortion.
    I would say this coin looks better than the scan,
    As for cleaning I won't venture that guess because of what I'm seeing.
  • Catch22Catch22 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭
    Possibly, but it's not apparent from the scan. Perhaps the dealer would agree to extend the return time to allow for certification or send it in for you and tack on a few bucks for the service.

    If it has been cleaned, it doesn't appear to be harsh.


    When we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary.

    Thomas Paine
  • coppercoinscoppercoins Posts: 6,084 ✭✭✭
    I don't think it has been cleaned. What I find amusing is that their blow-up is fuzzier than their macro. These people that sell die varieties really need to consider a $50 microscope purchase.
    C. D. Daughtrey, NLG
    The Lincoln cent store:
    http://www.lincolncent.com

    My numismatic art work:
    http://www.cdaughtrey.com
    USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
    image
  • Cam40Cam40 Posts: 8,146
    My question would be `is it authentic`
    For one,could a variety like this,visible to the naked eye,be pass by so many times and get that amount of wear before it was spotted plucked from circulation?I think not personally.
    Two because of the low grade condition I know of one,if not the only,diagnostic that would tell one way or the other if it was authentic is virtually worn away.A tiny faint die-scratch on the reverse at about 6:30.
    Maybe a very close examination on the date itself would reveal something amiss?
  • wingedlibertywingedliberty Posts: 4,805 ✭✭✭
    Obviously cleaned. Its authentic in my mind. Overall, a nice 42/1. The scan is horrible. They should
    invest in better technology.


    Brian.
  • coppercoinscoppercoins Posts: 6,084 ✭✭✭


    << <i>For one,could a variety like this,visible to the naked eye,be pass by so many times and get that amount of wear before it was spotted plucked from circulation?I think not personally. >>



    I think so, personally. Before the 1980s, 99% of the collecting world cared about what was easily naked-eye visible (usually errors only and not die varieties) and little to nothing else. The non-collecting public couldn't give a hoot less, especially before about 1965 when this coin could easily still have been in circulation. I think you are assuming too much in that people were then like people are now..and that's just not the case.
    C. D. Daughtrey, NLG
    The Lincoln cent store:
    http://www.lincolncent.com

    My numismatic art work:
    http://www.cdaughtrey.com
    USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
    image
  • clw54clw54 Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭
    Mercury dimes were plentiful in change throughout the sixties. It's quite possible it could have circulated for over 20 years without being discovered.

    Although the shop is a few miles away, I think the rule of thumb about a coin appealing to someone in the first 10 seconds is a good one. This is one to pass up. It will probably be snatched up within a week, though.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file