What label was PCGS using before they designated cameos? I found a nice coin that looks CAM for sure... or compared to some cams looks much better. LinkLink2
Before PCGS and NGC began using the "Cameo" and "Ultra/Deep Cameo" designations, they simply noted the grades (without any designations) on the grading labels.
There are lots and lots (and still more!) "Cameo" and "Ultra/deep Cameo" coins out there, that were graded before those designations were recognized/noted by NGC and PCGS. If/when they are resubmitted, they will receive the designation.
That is why the currently listed/stated "Cameo" and "Ultra/Deep Cameo" populations are so misleading in many cases. Some issues aren't nearly as scarce as one would believe, simply by looking at the population reports.
KlectorKid - the coin looks cameo but I wouldn't think it would be worth much of a premium, as such. It might bring an extra 10% or so because of the contrast.
We had a thread on here awhile back trying to determine when PCGS started using the DCAM designator. The oldest slab that was turned up was a PCGS 4. They were used between 1990 and 1995. Unless some one turns up an even older variety slab we can say that they've used DCAM for about 7 to 12 years.
I don't believe that the Cameo and Deep Cameo designations have been used on pre-1950 silver, gold and copper proof coins for more than a few (2 to 4) years. I left NGC in January of 1998 and those designations weren't in use at that time. I will see if I can get a more precise time period.
That 3 cent piece looks marginally cameo in that image. I am not sure it would go cameo. I bought one with noticably stronger cameo contrast. It didn't seem like I was paying a premium for it, I bought it at auction where a dozen or more were being sold, all graded around 66 Cameo.
I think that the designations are series specific. For Trade Dollars (the series that I collect), I agree with the comment of 2-4 years..... I actually that it is closer to the 2 year mark. More and more folks are turning in the old slabs for review and getting CAM designations. I know one old time collector that recently had a pile of Trade Dollar proofs reveiwed and got about 30-40% come back with CAM designations. Thus the reason that paying high $$$ for the holder designation can be very risky, who's to say that 30% of the entire population might get a CAM designation some day, paying premium money without seeing the coin is high risk.
Yes on the pre 1950's it has only been a year or so. I posted without having looked at the coin and the other responses never refered to pre or post 1950. I made the erroneous assumption from mbbikers post that it was an absolute question, "When did they start putting CAM on holders?".
Comments
Before PCGS and NGC began using the "Cameo" and "Ultra/Deep Cameo" designations, they simply noted the grades (without any designations) on the grading labels.
There are lots and lots (and still more!) "Cameo" and "Ultra/deep Cameo" coins out there, that were graded before those designations were recognized/noted by NGC and PCGS. If/when they are resubmitted, they will receive the designation.
That is why the currently listed/stated "Cameo" and "Ultra/Deep Cameo" populations are so misleading in many cases. Some issues aren't nearly as scarce as one would believe, simply by looking at the population reports.
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
I don't believe that the Cameo and Deep Cameo designations have been used on pre-1950 silver, gold and copper proof coins for more than a few (2 to 4) years. I left NGC in January of 1998 and those designations weren't in use at that time. I will see if I can get a more precise time period.
keoj