Interesting toning on a Morgan. Your thoughts.

wingedliberty

I enjoy this type of toning., but I guess its not for everyone. What do you guys think?
1904-O


Brian.

mbbiker

I don't like the toning, but looks like a nice coin otherwise.

agfox

It's not for everyone, but man is it original. Nice find.

wingedliberty

I have a hunch that it will turn out nicer than the scan.


Brian.

MrKelso

When it comes in post a better pic here so we can gaze apon it.

jamesfsm

Not wild about it either. Looks a bit dull and there's no discernable pattern to the toning. Sorry.

mbbiker

<< <i>When it comes in post a better pic here so we can gaze apon it. >>



yes please do so. i always enjoy seeing new coin pics.

nwcs

I've got one that looks almost exactly like it. An 1878S in 63. I've been torn on whether to send it to NCS, though. The surfaces are PL and maybe DMPL but didn't get the categorization due to the toning. But there is a nice long gouge on the nose running into the field that the toning makes it not stand out as much, but I wonder if it was conserved right whether PCGS would NG it the second time. The problem is evident even with toning so it's one of those "who knows" situations.

dragon

Coins with that type of coloration typically trade at a discount to white coins due to the fact that not many people like that kind of toning.

dragon

Dog97

The seller says "It has pretty toning on both sides" and it probably doesn't look as drab as the picture. It's not what everybody else would consider an attractive monster but you paid a fair price for it. It's kinda neat & different.