Home› PSA Set Registry Forum

Ok you 1972 collectors I need an ...................opinion on these cards

boggs301012boggs301012 Posts: 1,135 ✭✭
in PSA Set Registry Forum
which will grade better. Base on the front of the cards I can scan the backs if needed.
I know there not great I want a 5 or a 6 which has the best shot?
x

Comments

  • FBFB Posts: 1,684 ✭✭
    boggsie,

    Unless the corners are actually worse off than the scan shows - I'm betting that you get 6's with both of them.
    Frank Bakka
    Sets - 1970, 1971 and 1972
    Always looking for 1972 O-PEE-CHEE Baseball in PSA 9 or 10!

    lynnfrank@earthlink.net
    outerbankyank on eBay!
  • acowaacowa Posts: 945 ✭✭
    Boggsie,

    May I suggest plan C

    image


    It's on EBAY currently and priced at less than the grading fee.


    Also, this card is pretty sweet...but the seller is kind of shadyimage
    image




    To answer your question...the bottom card looks stained on the top right.





    Regards,


    Alan
  • TipemTipem Posts: 881 ✭


    Alan,

    Way to do your homework!!!
    Impressive and should be very helpful.

    Vic
    Please be kind to me. Even though I'm now a former postal employee, I'm still capable of snapping at any time.
  • boggs301012boggs301012 Posts: 1,135 ✭✭
    I wasnt to worried about the grade. I have had them since child hood that was the reason I wanted them graded .
    x
  • FBFB Posts: 1,684 ✭✭
    Alan,

    That O-Pee-Chee card looks pretty bad... Bad card and shady dealer doesn't make a good combination!image
    Frank Bakka
    Sets - 1970, 1971 and 1972
    Always looking for 1972 O-PEE-CHEE Baseball in PSA 9 or 10!

    lynnfrank@earthlink.net
    outerbankyank on eBay!
  • boggs301012boggs301012 Posts: 1,135 ✭✭
    I sent in the 2nd card. And recieved an 8!!!!!!!!!!! I am ludacris.....image

    Alan?Acowa plan A worked just fine.


    James
    x
  • VirtualizardVirtualizard Posts: 1,936 ✭✭
    Boggs,

    Do you mean the '71 NL HR Leaders card? If so, I guess your scan did not do it justice. Those corners don't look too great in the scan and I thought there were a couple of PD's on the card? Just wondered.

    JEB.
  • boggs301012boggs301012 Posts: 1,135 ✭✭
    Virtualizard


    Yes the same cards in the picture. My scanner shows picture darker then what they are. I emailed the Co but gave up when ever I change the settings from dark to normal it dosent remember the settings. I will put up a better scan of the card when I recieve it.
    x
  • boggs301012boggs301012 Posts: 1,135 ✭✭
    here it is with a better scan image
    x
  • dalewdalew Posts: 491
    Nice, but isn't that a stain on the top?

    If so, should have got a (ST) qualifier.

    Dale
    1st Finest Set - 1981 Baseball Fleer Basic - Retired
    1st Finest Set - 1981 Baseball Fleer Master - Retired
    1st Finest Set - 1955 Baseball Golden Stamps - Cleveland Indians - Retired
    1st Finest Set - Mel Harder Baseball Master - Active
    Mel Harder Showcase Set - Active
    #15 on Current Set Registry - 1972 Topps Baseball - Retired
    #23 on All Time Set Registry - 1972 Topps Baseball - Retired
  • VirtualizardVirtualizard Posts: 1,936 ✭✭


    << <i>Nice, but isn't that a stain on the top?

    If so, should have got a (ST) qualifier.

    Dale >>



    Dale/James,

    That's what I was referring to in my previous post ("Those corners don't look too great in the scan and I thought there were a couple of PD's on the card?".

    I just think that's a really ugly PSA 8. Just my opinion - don't beat me up too much for it. image

    JEB.
  • boggs301012boggs301012 Posts: 1,135 ✭✭


    Virtualizard, Dale


    I agree it is Fugly this card is a 7 st or straight 6 , 1/2 my order is ugly. Read my rant below this post to get an idea. This is the only card that is over graded.


    James
    x
Sign In or Register to comment.