MS70?
Blade
Posts: 1,744 ✭
Has PCGS slabbed any MS70 coins that are regular circulation issues? I don't mean commems, bullion, etc. They must be coins that circulate. It is ok if they originated in proof sets (not sure how much of an advantage that it). Just curious.
Tom
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
0
Comments
An MS70 can't originate in a proof set.
Registry 1909-1958 Proof Lincolns
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
Registry 1909-1958 Proof Lincolns
MCDBA MCSA MCP
SQL Server Database Admin
SQLgeek.org
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
So... why is this unobtainable? Are we saying that out of 10's of billions of coins meant for circulation, the mint has yet to produce a perfect example AND somehow maintain that coin's preservation as such? Seems unlikely. Perhaps some of those post-1999 Lincolns I have seen slabbed as MS69 are under the same "70 bias" as proofs have been the past few years (until recently when standards seemed to have been adjusted). Just brings up a curious point IMO.
dpoole (!!!!!!) What a beauty, but I think that's stretching the rules just a bit. That Kennedy is a flawless wonder, though.
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
Merz
<< <i> Merz >>
LOL! Thanks for the laugh.
would more than likely be a dime from a mint set or a late date cent from a mint set.
Some of the Philly dimes from the late 70's look almost like a branch mint proofs. Even
here though, there tend to be marks on them. The cents are easy to find without marks
but often have surface flaws caused by the plating.