Too good to be true?
Bikingnut
Posts: 3,375 ✭✭✭
I've been watching this auction, even placed a bid, but I just noticed that seller feedback is 1. Is it too good to be true? The quarter looks flawless.
43 washington MS67
43 washington MS67
US Navy CWO3 retired. 12/81-09/04
Looking for PCGS AU58 Washington's, 32-63.
Looking for PCGS AU58 Washington's, 32-63.
0
Comments
The coin is not slabbed, it is raw. It may have been in a NGC MS67 holder, but now, the coin is not slabbed, it is raw. Perhaps, you can communicate with the seller and offer to pay for the slabbing fees and every cost related once he produces a NGC MS67 43p quarter.
To answer your thread question, my opinion is yes.
I love Ike dollars and all other dollar series !!!
I also love Major Circulation Strike Type Sets, clad Washingtons ('65 to '98) and key date coins !!!!!
If ignorance is bliss, shouldn't we have more happy people ??
Looking for PCGS AU58 Washington's, 32-63.
No good deed will go unpunished.
Free Money Search
Looking for PCGS AU58 Washington's, 32-63.
<< <i>this out of its holder and put it in a Whitman folder >>
I fell for that line once. Ended up with a harshly cleaned POS Bust Half that looked nothing like the scans in the auction.
<< <i>He stated no return on the raw coins >>
The seller who screwed me in the above had the same policy.
Russ, NCNE
only problem is all 3 have the same reverse photo -
a close to full bands with a finger print over dime
I emailed asking for more info as 2 (I didn't know all 3 then) Mercury dimes have the same reverse photo.
AN honest mistake?
The seller/buyer has bought a couple nice photo equipment items in the last 3 weeks and feedback was a few months back - member for 1 year.
A good deal or steal?
Does anybody know from this obverse picture whether this picture is of a proof coin?