GAI GRADED PACKS QUESTION
SUPERPUNK813
Posts: 351 ✭
i do not own anything graded by gai but i have thought about buying some gai graded vintage packs. there is a sweet looking gai 9 1968 topps football pack ending on ebay tonight and id like to here what some of my fellow forum members think about graded packs. also has anyone seen one of the pack holders in person? id like to know how thick they are. i know how most of you feel about gai but as of now there the only company grading vintage unopened packs.
Check out my new web site: Monsters of the Gridiron
0
Comments
Always looking for 1957 Topps BB in PSA 9!
Joe
I have bought several unopened wax boxes from Mark Murphy in the past and his stuff is always Mint as he has stated,so with him doing the grading,you can be pretty confident in the quality you are getting.The only down side that I have found in unopened wax is that there is not too much enjoyment in looking at a wax pack.I sold all mine and have concentrated on a 56 set instead.At least with cards,you can enjoy your investment.
Just a thought
Vic
<< <i>Also, their top grader is a heavy seller of unopened stuff. I question how GAI can gain credibilty when they allow their chief grader to grade and sell his own material. >>
I asked them about this, being curious myself. In fact, Steve (Rocchi, president of Global) told me they have others grade/authenticate Mark Murphy's packs, including Adam Martin of Dave & Adams and one other person (I can't recall right now). So, Mark's not grading/authentication his own stuff...
Joe
<< <i>In this auction, Mark mentions the pack was authenticated and graded by Adam Rothans. Is that the other guy Steve mentioned perchance? >>
No - I would have remembered if he mentioned Adam.
inevitably get some amount of "special treatment"
when it comes to grades on his packs don't you think?
I mean if these guys know they are grading his
stuff and it is say, "close to a 9" then they would
likely just go on and give it to HIM, where as they
might not with you or me (or even sol )
<< <i>still, it does seem that he would
inevitably get some amount of "special treatment"
when it comes to grades on his packs don't you think?
I mean if these guys know they are grading his
stuff and it is say, "close to a 9" then they would
likely just go on and give it to HIM, where as they
might not with you or me (or even sol ) >>
That can go to anything, and just continues on the "larger/more connected players get better treatment" belief that exists with just about every grading company. At some point, you have to make a leap of faith and believe that either grading is a sham, or it's legit.
That is why I get cards graded by PSA. I have "Faith"
that They will at least be impartial and fair when grading
my cards, and that if they make an honest mistake,
they will correct it.
But if I was a grader for them, I would likely not even be
able to submit cards to PSA because of the simple
appearance of impropriety.
I just think that Mark Murphy is having to deal with the
problems that stem from that appearance of impropriety.
~jeff
I agree 100%.
Always looking for 1957 Topps BB in PSA 9!