NTC...Calling all AT experts
NumisLusus
Posts: 9 ✭
OK, I've read all of the previous threads on NTC...Good stuff.
My question is, are These Franks AT???
I received the coins today and they do grade MS65 FBL. The FBL could be better in 1 or 2 cases but they would all pass by PCGS standards.
I know AT (or grade for that matter) is hard to tell via scan but the color is very weird. They almost look gold plated. Toning is consistent across the coin for all coins except for one where it almost looks like the toning flaked off on the reverse.
I have sent a polite email to the seller asking for his take on things. It bounced back due to a full inbox. I will resend tomorrow.
Also, the seller is 'centles' (from FL...Hhhmmm). I have noticed other NTC coins from him with similar toning (check paste posts and go the the auction links). Is this guy trying to AT???
I typically stay with blast white coins so I am not a toning expert by any means. Any feedback welcome.
Thanks.
My question is, are These Franks AT???
I received the coins today and they do grade MS65 FBL. The FBL could be better in 1 or 2 cases but they would all pass by PCGS standards.
I know AT (or grade for that matter) is hard to tell via scan but the color is very weird. They almost look gold plated. Toning is consistent across the coin for all coins except for one where it almost looks like the toning flaked off on the reverse.
I have sent a polite email to the seller asking for his take on things. It bounced back due to a full inbox. I will resend tomorrow.
Also, the seller is 'centles' (from FL...Hhhmmm). I have noticed other NTC coins from him with similar toning (check paste posts and go the the auction links). Is this guy trying to AT???
I typically stay with blast white coins so I am not a toning expert by any means. Any feedback welcome.
Thanks.
0
Comments
TRUTH
Tooth & Mike - I figured he was a former ACGer. Thanks for the verification.
Funny thing is, these coins look like they wouldn't have any problems untoned. I guess my question is, what was someone trying to cover up?. Luster looks full under the toning?
I've gotten halfs out of proof sets with the same kind of light gold toning - it's not common but not rare either. They can easily be created though.
Centsless does take returns (or he did - I only bought from him once and returned it). He is (or was) a major ACG seller. Maybe he's branched out to AT?
If you like em, keep em.
My posts viewed times
since 8/1/6
Second: Is this toning covering up something? ie Making the coin "look" like a higher grade?
Third: Does the toning enhance the value?
If you like it, and you answer NO to the last two questions who cares if it's AT?
jom
The result.
What one is more accurate the auction?
As for the pic Placid posted, the pic on EBay is actually closer. I could tell when I bid that the coins had some funky golden toning.
The coins are actually very nice. They are consistent with the grade, luster appears full under the toning, and I can't find anything that the toning would be trying to cover up.
I guess what really perplexes me is that I have noticed many of the coins he has for sale have similar toning. If he is ATing...why? The coins I bought look like they would make MS65FBL in a PCGS holder...if they didn't get bagged for AT.
Oh well, I have a proof on the way from him which appears to have similar toning from the scan on the auction. Guess I'll have to wait and see when I get it.
Frank
I purchased an NTC Peace Dollar MS64 from centsles a few weeks back and found it to be right up to form. I believe it would cross to NGC or PCGS. COnsidering I paid about 15% less than MS63 money for it, I'm feeling like I did OK. I will probably crack it and send it to NGC to as opposed to sending the NTC slab, which would probably get me a 60 just on principle.
Back to centsles, I got the merchandise fast, I believe it was a good value regardless of the slab, the coin is lusterous with nice eye appeal and the guy communicated well and left positive feedback after receiving payment.