Odd Roosies. A 1997 D and 2000 D

Cam40

I,m calling the 1997 D the `97 `weird`D Roosie and possibly a double-eye.
The 2000 D looks nearly like an RPD? Also the eye-area of the 2000 D for comparison to the `97 D.
Strike or Die-fatigue doubling maybe?
The doubled D on the 2000 is tough to see even with a 10x loupe.Its awful subtle and seen really with 60X magnification.
What do you all think.



Now for the 1997 D Roosie..........

Cam40

The 2000 D pics didnt come out.....trying to fix it............. or I,ll wait as the pics may not be ` in the system`
yet....If they dont come up fairly soon ,I,ll try again.

Cam40

Cam40

1997 D 1st
1997 D 2nd
1997 D 3rd
1997 D 4th

1997 D 5th

Cam40

2000 D over D?
2002 D eye area for comparing to the `97 D eye area

Spinynorman

I'd say die deterioration and strike doubling.

Cam40

I,d say your right too.Just like playing with the microscope and showng my odd finds.
The thing I find most odd is the eye area on the `97 D.