Wear versus rub difference
OnlyBuffalos
Posts: 817
I have a few PCGS MS65 and and many MS63 coins which under magnification look as if someone has wiped away the luster on some of the high spots. To me it looks like wear. I have shown these coins to several dealers who say it is rub not wear. I also have several PCGS AU58 coins which have the same characteristics -- I assume this is supposed to be wear on these coins. I do not see any differences between the MS65/MS63 and AU58 coins, all look to have the same "rub".
Can anyone shed some light on how to distinguish between wear and rub? Can a coin be MS65 with rub? Thanks.
Can anyone shed some light on how to distinguish between wear and rub? Can a coin be MS65 with rub? Thanks.
0
Comments
Tom
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
Rub: Same as above but it looks really nice so I want the higher grade money anyway.
Normal wear happens from the high points first. In commerce this comes primarily
from banging against counters, pocket change, car keys, and other coins as they go
through a coin counter. This friction eventually will cause the high spots of the coin
to lose their luster. This is normal wear.
Rub is essentially the same thing except that it is what collectors do to the coin. They
slid album slides over it, pushed it in a folder, and passed it from hand to hand. This
type of abuse makes much finer scratches on the high points and the lower relief will
tend to be more affected. There really is a fine distinction between the two and few
collectors see a need to differentiate them.