Its always very diffulcult to judge a coin by the scan/pic. The 62 is a cam for sure, but all the coins seem to be spotted. If this is on the coins then the grades will suffer, but if the fields are clean with no hairlines then a pr67 to a 68 could be expected. The reverse on the upper 61 seems to be spotted very badly, again hard to tell from the pic......
Be Bop A Lula!! "Senorita HepKitty" "I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
I don't think the 62 would cam, even at NGC, I don;t think the fields are deep enough (maybe a dip will fix this) and is there a fingerprint by ICA in AMERICA?
<< <i>is there a fingerprint by ICA in AMERICA? >>
Looks like a milkspot above the R and some haze by the ICA. All three coins have milkspots on them. I would conjecture that none are better than 66 and none are cam.
Comments
The 62 probably 66-67 maybe cam.
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
<< <i>Any thoughts of possible grades would be appreciated. A little brighter scan thanks for looking rickpics. >>
Haze from the scanner glass makes it tuff to say. The 62 looks borderline. Is that a mark on the coin OBV ?
"The silver is mine and the gold is mine,' declares the LORD GOD Almighty."
<< <i>is there a fingerprint by ICA in AMERICA? >>
Looks like a milkspot above the R and some haze by the ICA. All three coins have milkspots on them. I would conjecture that none are better than 66 and none are cam.