Attention: Don, Russ, others ... SMS sets and the "Big Set" now up on registry!

RGL

Register away ... The SMS yearly sets for 1965-67 are up, along with the set for all three years. Grab away my two-coin, second finest ever 1965 SMS set if you dare ... (but, had to boast about another made coin) And, Russ ... picked up another SMS raw JFK that will go -- grading gremlins forgiving -- 1967 67-CAM!

Russ

Even if I registered all my 1965 SMS coins, I wouldn't be able to knock you off. All I have is the Kennedy.

Russ, NCNE

RGL

Russ: Knowing about all the '64 coins you made -- other than JFKs -- in your 1964 proof set expeditions, I assumed you had done the same with the Special Mint Sets!

DHeath

Man, I gotta go back to the safe and see what I have. Too cool. I love those coins. Thanks for the heads up.

DHeath

OK, I put up my 65-67 starter set. Best I could do was 3rd place (out of three sets). I tried to enter my NGC coins, but for some reason that feature doesn't work yet!

Set link

RGL

A good start ... and nice JFKs, Don!

itsnotjustme

Knocked out of first place already!

RGL

Whoa, MTH has, according to the page, the finest possible 65-67 SMS set: LINK.

And, this is not to criticize his superior set, which I never will approach, but how is it possible to have the finest set when only three of the 15 coins in the set are top pops? Anyone? Are the CAM/DCAM bonuses on his coins such that they cannot be matched even with a greater number of top pops? Curious minds want to know ...

RGL

Sorry, but TTT ... Any one have an answer/theory to this enigma?

itsnotjustme

Clearly the finest possible number is wrong.

KAJ1

So...

Will this drive up the prices for SMS coins?

Kevin

oldcameoproofsguy

Does anyone have a 100% CAM/DCAM collection? I kind of glanced over the sets registered and I don't think that I saw one.

itsnotjustme

That would be quite an accomplishment. On the cents there are only 9/11/21 CAM or DCAM for 65/66/67.

Russ

<< <i>Clearly the finest possible number is wrong. >>



Brian is correct. For some reason when the set registries first get listed, they always show the total for the #1 set as the finest possible number. Shortly after, the database adjusts and posts the correct number.

Russ, NCNE