Speaking of wild toning...
shylock
Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
...as we often do here, has anyone seen this 1888 Liberty Nickel in person?
Paul <> altered surfaces <> CoinGallery.org
0
Comments
edited cuz I can't spell technical
Dragon
Brian.
Why don't any of these tone like you can sometimes find Jefferson and Buffalo nickels -- with lustrous concentric rings of blue, yellow, and rose?
Reverse
Russ, NCNE
Edited to add: on trying to put together a a close matched set probably the nickel I won't be able to, but maybe the quarter and half I can come close. And of coarse not the penney.
Here's an example the kind of toning (from mnmcoins recent thread -- huge photo, by the way) that I was talking about:
Toned Jefferson
Probably usually found with a bit more blue and less pink, but that's the idea.
And Buffalo nickels are often found with nice similar hues.
Liberty Nickels are the same composition as later nickels, right? So what's the problem? Flat design altering the toning pattern? Ugly coins so people just collect them as part of a type set, instead of a complete date set in an album where they tone nicely? Just not enough of them around so the odds are against finding a nicely toned one?
Or... dbldie55 collects them and hates toning, so he's been dipping them all???
I went and looked at the Sunnywood collection, only two coins pictured (along with some very pretty numbers ). One of the coins was very similar in coloration to the one that started this thread, but has much nicer luster (from the photo anyway). The other had some crescent toning -- which was ok, but nothing to get excited about compared to other nickel series.
But regarding the nickel composition -- that was my point -- same composition, why the difference in finding nicely toned? And why the apparently much different color pattern (if this and the similar Sunnywood coin are representative examples)?
I'm still perplexed!