Home U.S. Coin Forum

Another submission report

This is the second part of the report I posted yesterday. Once again, I really thought they would both go DCAM, but I guess you need to put some Betty Crocker vanilla frosting on the devices to make that happen these days. These coins are SO much more cameo than the DCAMs they give out to the proofs made these days its not even funny.

1 90040624 1957 25C PR68CA
2 90040625 1956 50C Type 2 PR67CA

Comments

  • LucyBopLucyBop Posts: 14,001 ✭✭✭
    Thats cause PCGs reserves all DCAM grades for Lucy, they are just stingy with her on the Mint State Franklins!
    imageBe Bop A Lula!!
    "Senorita HepKitty"
    "I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
  • I guess I could try and use Hepcat City on the return address on my submission form image
  • Greg, i have an idea, why don't you crack'em out and spraypaint the devices with Chrome paint and resubmit. They'ed have to get a DCAM designation then. image
    Just an thought.


    Dave
    Love those toned Washingtons
  • relayerrelayer Posts: 10,570

    I got my 1959 50c back PR67 WITH NO CAM.

    Man, I can shave using that coin instead of the mirror.
    image
    My posts viewed image times
    since 8/1/6
  • Aagh.......those HepCat DCAMs! Hey Lucy, your numericals hurt a bit on the business strike coins, however you sure nailed every FBL. There have been many a coin sent in hoping for FBL that didn't make it!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file