Special Mint Sets were produced from 1965 through 1967 (and some other years for single coins). There were no mint sets or proof sets these years... only SMS coins. These are generally nicer than standard mint set coins, even being cameo or deep cameo in some cases.
The special mint sets have never caught on with people. Proof set collectors consider them mint sets, and mnt set collectors think of them as proof sets since they often look like proofs. They are actually both in many ways since the processes used to produce the coins varied so much over the short time they were produced. Some of the '65's were struck with regular circulation dies which had been polished and struck on pol- ished blanks. They look awful, but most are very high grade. Most were struck once by polished dies (acid etched for cameo devices) and handled like regular mint set coins. But in addition to the various minting, preparation, and handling procedures there are also some which are cross-overs, so they probably range from pure business strike to full proofs. To complicate matters some coins released to circulation appeared like they could be SMS.
They're usually graded SMS. Nobody around here seems to know exactly how to tell the difference, but with most it is apparent. Look at several sets- - you'll soon start seeing how tough it is.
There are also rare Jefferson SMS issues from 1964. They command very high prices.
"The essence of sleight of hand is distraction and misdirection. If smoeone can be convinced that he has, through his own perspicacity, divined your hidden purposes, he will not look further."
Blaze - Yellow male b 3/17/93 Onyx - Black male b 3/7/99 Duchess - Yellow female mix b 3/12/02 rescued 9/18/02 Rifle - Yellow male mix b 12/1/02 rescued 8/8/03 Diamond - Black female b 5/3/05 adopted 8/3/05
SMS coins are fun. The SMS coins from '65-'67 sometimes have cameo contrast with nice fields that look like mirrors. As there were no other mint sets or proof sets made those years some, including PCGS and myself, consider them to be proofs.
There were SMS Jefferson and Kennedy coins made in '94 and '97 (If I am remembering things correctly) that have a matte proof like finish. As there were also proofs and mint sets those years these are something completely different. I am almost alone in calling them matte proofs. Nobody can argue with calling them SMS coins.
As BNE said I've heard there were a few SMS sets (8?, 11?) made in 1964, naturally they are rare and expensive.
I think Cameo SMS coins from '65 to '67 should be worth as much as cameo proofs of years that have similiar population numbers. They often are less so represent an undervalued coin IMHO.
<< <i>They're usually graded SMS. Nobody around here seems to know exactly how to tell the difference, but with most it is apparent. Look at several sets- - you'll soon start seeing how tough it is. >>
It can be tough on some and easier on others. The ones that are prooflike are pretty easy but if they don't look prooflike, I can't tell.
The one in my grading challenge this week is nicely prooflike in person even though it doesn't show up well in the picture.
Time sure flies when you don't know what you are doing...
Comments
them mint sets, and mnt set collectors think of them as proof sets since they often look
like proofs. They are actually both in many ways since the processes used to produce
the coins varied so much over the short time they were produced. Some of the '65's
were struck with regular circulation dies which had been polished and struck on pol-
ished blanks. They look awful, but most are very high grade. Most were struck once by
polished dies (acid etched for cameo devices) and handled like regular mint set coins.
But in addition to the various minting, preparation, and handling procedures there are
also some which are cross-overs, so they probably range from pure business strike to
full proofs. To complicate matters some coins released to circulation appeared like they
could be SMS.
the difference, but with most it is apparent. Look at several sets- - you'll soon start seeing
how tough it is.
William S. Burroughs, Cities of the Red Night
Blaze - Yellow male b 3/17/93
Onyx - Black male b 3/7/99
Duchess - Yellow female mix b 3/12/02 rescued 9/18/02
Rifle - Yellow male mix b 12/1/02 rescued 8/8/03
Diamond - Black female b 5/3/05 adopted 8/3/05
First Cam-slam - 9/21/04
My eBay
SMS coins are fun. The SMS coins from '65-'67 sometimes have cameo contrast with nice fields that look like mirrors. As there were no other mint sets or proof sets made those years some, including PCGS and myself, consider them to be proofs.
There were SMS Jefferson and Kennedy coins made in '94 and '97 (If I am remembering things correctly) that have a matte proof like finish. As there were also proofs and mint sets those years these are something completely different. I am almost alone in calling them matte proofs. Nobody can argue with calling them SMS coins.
As BNE said I've heard there were a few SMS sets (8?, 11?) made in 1964, naturally they are rare and expensive.
I think Cameo SMS coins from '65 to '67 should be worth as much as cameo proofs of years that have similiar population numbers. They often are less so represent an undervalued coin IMHO.
<< <i>They're usually graded SMS. Nobody around here seems to know exactly how to tell the difference, but with most it is apparent. Look at several sets- - you'll soon start seeing how tough it is. >>
It can be tough on some and easier on others. The ones that are prooflike are pretty easy but if they don't look prooflike, I can't tell.
The one in my grading challenge this week is nicely prooflike in person even though it doesn't show up well in the picture.
CoinPeople.com || CoinWiki.com || NumisLinks.com