New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
DCAM - thanks for the nice comments, the coin deserves it. As Kranky mentioned it's my listing and as mentioned in the BST forum, it's essentially full red and lustrous but with enough woodgrain variegation to merit RB. You do, however, see many 1877 RDs that got more slack than this one.
Admittedly it will be tough to get its true value in an ICG holder. Thought I'd test the waters and see if some collector could see through the plastic on this one.
Paul- I had no idea that was a Member's coin. Wow! I've been on Ebay just short of 4 years now and I don't know if I've seen but maybe 4, or so, of the 1877 IHC in better than gem condition.
I'm interested. Did you make the coin? Did you pick the coin up in your part of the country?I've seen a lot of coins in RD holders that didn't show the brilliance of that coin. Really nice!
I bought it about a year and a half ago, on a short layaway from Rick Snow (Eagle Eye Rare Coins), and it was already made in the ICG holder. He described it then as "99% RED. Fully struck with outstanding problem free surfaces...Improvable only by getting a full red example." It's one of the few ICG slabs I've seen with his photoseal, and felt it was about as nice an example as I would find that I could just barely afford.
It's tough to place a figure on the % of red with this coin. Virtually all of the "non-red" is slightly darker toned grains of alloy that filter through it. It's not your typical RB with large areas of brown toning, and the result is a full red look on a RB coin.
I personally love that 72RB. It's been holdered at least three years [stable color], no woodgraining. The image looks like it has a good chance to go RD. This is the kind that Eagle Eye often refers to as 90 or even 99% red. Always wondered why they weren't in RD holders, if he thought they were that much red. At least my interpretation of Rick Montgomery's explanation of copper color would seem to indicate that a coin with that % of red should be in a RD holder.
Comments
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
Admittedly it will be tough to get its true value in an ICG holder. Thought I'd test the waters and see if some collector could see through the plastic on this one.
I was thinkin' to myself, "dang- where did I see that thing last night?"
I guess
I had no idea that was a Member's coin. Wow! I've been on Ebay just short of 4 years now and I don't know if I've seen but maybe 4, or so, of the 1877 IHC in better than gem condition.
I'm interested. Did you make the coin? Did you pick the coin up in your part of the country?I've seen a lot of coins in RD holders that didn't show the brilliance of that coin. Really nice!
Paul,
Very beautiful coin.
Best of luck with your sale.
It's tough to place a figure on the % of red with this coin. Virtually all of the "non-red" is slightly darker toned grains of alloy that filter through it. It's not your typical RB with large areas of brown toning, and the result is a full red look on a RB coin.