Sacs most numismatically interesting moderns?
DHeath
Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
As I think about the Sac's demise as a circulating coin, I wonder how collectors will view the coin in say 20 years. They are very unpopular with the public, and most collectors poofah them as novelties. As the current modern circs go, they seem much more interesting to me than the other coinage. I like the state quarter program, and it is indeed interesting, but the Sacs are more numismatically interesting in my mind because of the following -
» They have a unique finish. (new process)
» They are treated with anti-oxidant (new process)
» They wear poorly
» They take on quite a variety of looks with wear (Olive/Dark Copper/Brass/Bright Gold/etc.)
» They will be an interesting coin with some remaining luster around the devices
» They are a unique composition (new process)
» Toning really occurs rapidly
» There were P and D burnished coins in limited quantity in 2000 (Millenium and Goodacre) (new process)
» All coins after 2001 are not made for normal circulation
I think they are a more interesting coin than the SBA, and have the duration of production of the Flying Eagle cent, or say the Trime. We'll see in twenty years.
Edited to add - I'm not promoting collecting them to anyone, but I think the coin and process are more interesting than that of the other coins, except maybe the barrel plating of the Lincolns.
» They have a unique finish. (new process)
» They are treated with anti-oxidant (new process)
» They wear poorly
» They take on quite a variety of looks with wear (Olive/Dark Copper/Brass/Bright Gold/etc.)
» They will be an interesting coin with some remaining luster around the devices
» They are a unique composition (new process)
» Toning really occurs rapidly
» There were P and D burnished coins in limited quantity in 2000 (Millenium and Goodacre) (new process)
» All coins after 2001 are not made for normal circulation
I think they are a more interesting coin than the SBA, and have the duration of production of the Flying Eagle cent, or say the Trime. We'll see in twenty years.
Edited to add - I'm not promoting collecting them to anyone, but I think the coin and process are more interesting than that of the other coins, except maybe the barrel plating of the Lincolns.
Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
0
Comments
Your analysis, while thorough, discounts one important consideration. They're butt ugly.
Russ, NCNE
I especially like the eagle.
Also, I think the story behind Sacagawea is interesting. I also like the serious amount of detail in the eyes of Sacagawea and the papoose cloth.
Just my opinion - No matter how long they run or how collectible they become (or not) I really think they're fun and different.
Michael
DHeath: Could you possibly expand on the last two points you made as I find them interesting, but don't know that much about it. I have a couple of rolls that I am saving - Roll of 2K and roll of 02, but don't have any 01's yet.
ie.
» There were P and D burnished coins in limited quantity in 2000 (Millenium and Goodacre) (new process)
» All coins after 2001 are not made for normal circulation
The US Mint recently announced the Sacagawea would no longer be produced for circulation, but would continue to be produced for collectors at least through this year. Richbeat is right about the timimg, so my statement should read "All coins after 2002 ". As for the burnished coins, both the Millenium coin (2000-D from the Mill coin and currency set) and the Goodacre presentation dollar (2000-P 5000 specially prepared coins used to pay Glenna for her design work) were burnished (polished), and are a different look.
Note - Many 2000 coins have been found raw that appear burnished, and have the same finish.
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
The Lincoln cent store:
http://www.lincolncent.com
My numismatic art work:
http://www.cdaughtrey.com
USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
<< <i>The mint DID strike 2002 Sacs for circulation, before the decision was made to suspend production. Mint production figures through September 2002 show a total of 7,177,610 total Sacs struck: 3,732,000 for Denver and 3,445,610 for Philadelphia. Production figures do not include mint sets and bag and roll sales. The Sac is not dead yet, there is a niche for them: full line vending machines, the US Postal Service, toll roads and mass transit, self service car washes, a slow growth in amusement game arcades and even countries such as Ecuador and El Salvador. Granted, the demand is small but it's there and will eventually deplete the stockpile on hand. I would suspect that more will be struck by then. So far I have found one 2002P Sac in a roll I went through last week (not purchased from the mint.) I'll be saving the ones that I find. At face value purchase I'm not out anything and can always spend them later if I decide to. >>
richbeat, according to this week's Coin World, none of the 2002 Sacs have been put into circulation and any examples found there would have come from people spending the ones bought from the Mint in rolls or bags.
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor